“Harry Potter is the End of an Era. Twilight is the End of an Error.”
At first glance, 당신 would think this is just another oh-so-clever Anti-Twilight slogan, reiterated 의해 the Twilight hating masses, but in reality, are these antis only slamming themselves?
First off, what Era is Harry Potter ending? It’s own? So in other words, “Harry Potter is the end of Harry Potter”.
I’m assuming this “Error” is meant to represent Twilight, correct? So in other words, much like the above, “Twilight is the end of Twilight”.
In conclusion, “Harry Potter is the End of Harry Potter. Twilight is the End of Twilight.”
^Is that really for 또는 against anything?
Do to the lack of sense this holds, I’m going to guess I misinterpreted the whole thing.
~~~
I’m going to try approaching this from a different angle. Hopefully, things will start to clear up.
~~~
Is this meant to demonstrate that the beginning of Harry Potter ended the 이전 Era, which obviously lacked quality literature?
That sounds plausible.
Since Harry potter isn’t ending itself, I suppose it’s 안전한, 안전 to say that Twilight isn’t either, so I guess Twilight really did end some sort of error. That’s a good thing, right? If an Error can’t be corrected, then it should at least be ended.
I guess we should all thank Twilight for ending an Error, but a new 질문 arises. What is this Error of which Twilight so nobly ended? Let’s restate the facts together.
*It’s already been concluded that Harry Potter ended the 이전 Era…
*Twilight ended an Error…
*The first Harry Potter book was released on June 30, 1997…
*The 이전 Era was ended on June 30, 1997…
*The first Twilight book was released on October 5, 2005…
*The Error was ended on October 5, 2005…
*The first Harry Potter book was released before the first Twilight book…
*The Era was ended before the Error was ended…
*Harry Potter ended an Era, but later, Twilight came around and ended an Error…
I hate to say it, but this slogan offers only one possibility… The End of an Era was an Error.
An Error which Twilight corrected… no.
THE Error which Twilight corrected!
At first glance, 당신 would think this is just another oh-so-clever Anti-Twilight slogan, reiterated 의해 the Twilight hating masses, but in reality, are these antis only slamming themselves?
First off, what Era is Harry Potter ending? It’s own? So in other words, “Harry Potter is the end of Harry Potter”.
I’m assuming this “Error” is meant to represent Twilight, correct? So in other words, much like the above, “Twilight is the end of Twilight”.
In conclusion, “Harry Potter is the End of Harry Potter. Twilight is the End of Twilight.”
^Is that really for 또는 against anything?
Do to the lack of sense this holds, I’m going to guess I misinterpreted the whole thing.
~~~
I’m going to try approaching this from a different angle. Hopefully, things will start to clear up.
~~~
Is this meant to demonstrate that the beginning of Harry Potter ended the 이전 Era, which obviously lacked quality literature?
That sounds plausible.
Since Harry potter isn’t ending itself, I suppose it’s 안전한, 안전 to say that Twilight isn’t either, so I guess Twilight really did end some sort of error. That’s a good thing, right? If an Error can’t be corrected, then it should at least be ended.
I guess we should all thank Twilight for ending an Error, but a new 질문 arises. What is this Error of which Twilight so nobly ended? Let’s restate the facts together.
*It’s already been concluded that Harry Potter ended the 이전 Era…
*Twilight ended an Error…
*The first Harry Potter book was released on June 30, 1997…
*The 이전 Era was ended on June 30, 1997…
*The first Twilight book was released on October 5, 2005…
*The Error was ended on October 5, 2005…
*The first Harry Potter book was released before the first Twilight book…
*The Era was ended before the Error was ended…
*Harry Potter ended an Era, but later, Twilight came around and ended an Error…
I hate to say it, but this slogan offers only one possibility… The End of an Era was an Error.
An Error which Twilight corrected… no.
THE Error which Twilight corrected!
