토론 Club
가입하기
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
I found this in my notes for my English class... I figured I'd share them with 당신 here.

In Classical times, heterosexuality, 또는 the 사랑 of a man for a woman, was considered to be "an animalistic urge to be slaked quickly only for the purpose of reproduction" (Henry Staten, English 202 instructor) while "platonic love" 또는 the 사랑 of a man for another man, was considered idealistic and "above the beasts."

Such close 프렌즈 were in fact called "lovers," like Hercules and Hylas. To fall in 사랑 with a man was the "proper" thing to do at the time, and signified a wonderous thing.

This "homosociality" as it has come to be known, is not exactly the same as homosexuality. Men touched, even kissed, but were not necessarily sexual with one another, 또는 at least they didn't consider it to be sex. They were at ease, would hold hands, and trusted men 더 많이 than they trusted their female counterparts.

However, as the Renaissance rolled about, and women's status was elevated to that of muses and Goddesses (Dante's Beatrice and Petrarch's Laura), the 사랑 between a man and woman was no longer considered that of a bestial urge, but indeed on par with the 사랑 shared between men.

Even in the Renaissance, however, the line between heterosexuality and homosexuality was still blurred with the homosocial concept, and everyone became, in a sense, bisexuals. William Shakespeare, one of the world's most famous Renaissance poets, is infamous for his ambiguous sexuality, embodied particularly in sonnet # 20 ("A man in hue all hues in his controlling/Which steals men's eyes and women's souls amazeth... But since she pricked thee out for women's pleasure/Mine be thy love, and thy love's use their treasure"). Not to mention his blatant commentary on the ambiguity of sexuality in general in his plays "Twelfth Night" and "As 당신 Like It."

As the Renaissance wound down, however, and we entered the Age of Enlightenment, 기독교 regained its stance on the topic of homosexuality and it became one of the cardinal sins for a long time, up until the twentieth century. The homosocial culture of Classical Times and the Renaissance was dashed, and men became afraid of touching each other even in the most casual of ways. Where they would have comfortably held hands walking down a road, 또는 kissed one's cheek as a thank you, they became isolated, and aggressive, for women were once again considered beneath them and untrustworthy, and they 로스트 their platonic lovers, and thus became malcontented, and we 로스트 much of the art and beauty produced 의해 the Renaissance.

Even now, through Pride Parades and media representation, homosexuality is still considered 의해 many to be "evil" 또는 "sinful" based on certain passages of the Bible (specifically the book of Leviticus) 또는 the Koran 또는 other Holy 책 and scriptures. My only purpose in 글쓰기 this is basically to ask this question.

We consider many things from the Classical and Renaissance eras to be beautiful and intellectual achievements of man. Meanwhile, in modern times, we consider ourselves to be lazy and belligerent, defensive and close-minded. When there were no "rules" on who one could 또는 couldn't love, and when no one was trying to infringe upon everyone else (politically, religiously, and artistically), mankind made some of his best achievements. Mankind was also sexually ambiguous. And now in a world full of labels and judgment, we consider it our responsibility to tell others when they're wrong according to our own values. Why do 당신 think this is?

Mellow out, people. Lighten up, and stop being so judgmental. "Straight" people were once considered unusual and heterosexuality was considered to be "less than human."

So are we progressing 또는 are we regressing?

I'll just sum it up.

Heterosexuality was once considered vulgar and necessary only for reproduction all the way through the Renaissance Era. "True love" was thought to exist between two people of the same sex, not between a man and a woman. It was only in the Age of Enlightenment when 기독교 regained its foothold on 유럽 that homosexuality once again became a sin.

All I'm saying is, our perspectives change with the time. Why tell someone else that they're wrong based on your set of values?

"You should show courtesy and be cordial with each other, so that no one should consider himself superior to another, nor do him harm."
-The Prophet Muhammed

"Love Thy neighbor as 당신 would yourself"
-Jesus

"Whatever 당신 so wish that men would do to you, do so to them, for this is the law..."
-Matthew 7:12
Preface: This was my final paper for one of my college courses at the 대학 of Washington. Considering recent conversations on this spot, I decided to share it. I take no offense if no one reads it completely - it's an academic paper, not a tweet 또는 a 페이스북 status update, so I know it's long and wordy. Lastly (and this should go without saying) Plagiarism rules apply, and this is easily searchable on the Interwebs so, 당신 know, be smart.

Why is the education of women important to development?

According to the UN Arab Human Development 신고 from 2005, “an Arab renaissance cannot be...
continue reading...
Soon it will be illegal to troll in the state of Arizona.
video
bill
law
arizona
illegal
trolling
jail
news
added by Cinders
Source: http://www.stickershoppe.com
"For a long time I've been operating from a certain core assumption that we are all essentially the same inside, and that our differences are 의해 and large situational. That goes for everybody— Bush, Bin Laden, Tony Blair, me, you… Palestinians, everybody of any particular religion. I know there is a good chance that this assumption actually is false. But it's convenient, because it always leads to 질문 about the way privilege shelters people from the consequences of their actions. It's also convenient because it leads to some level of forgiveness, whether justified 또는 not."

Rachel Corrie,...
continue reading...
I dont find this 질문 are that intelligent though
video
기독교
christians
10 질문
added by tamore
Source: https://www.facebook.com/youdontsaycampaign
Trailer for the upcoming documentary, "Dark Girls", which focuses on the increasing, disturbing trend of views of light and dark skin complexions among the African American community, particularly in African American women.
video
dark girls
dark girl
dark
girl
girls
documentary
미리 보기
trailer
더 많이 in comments.
video
teenpregnancy
choice
parentalissues
maury
Bill O'Reilly on 여우 News has called Dr. George Tiller a "baby killer" repeatedly for years for providing legal abortion services, but, when Dr. Tiller was murdered in his Kansas church last month, Bill O'Reilly backtracked from his statements.
video
여우
news
bill o'reilly
George
homicide
abortion
dr. scott roeder
added by Dearheart
Congressman Forbes asks the 질문 "Did America ever consider itself a Judeo-Christian nation?" and "If America was once a Judeo-Christian nation, when did it cease to be?" on the floor of the US House.
video
politics
political
congress
us
america
토론
christian
founding fathers
Mary Alice Carr, Vice President of NARAL Pro-Choice New York, takes on Bill O'Reilly in February 2004.
video
토론
politics
abortion
pro life
pro choice
bill o'reilly
mary alice carr
naral
o'reilly factor
여우 news
An instant classic...Rick captures the mood of the country.
video
politics
political
rant
rick santelli
money
economy
obama
stimulus
added by DrDevience
Source: Lori Leidig
added by oneshyguy46
Source: mulletacious
added by Cinders
Source: Joel Pett / USA Today / CWS
The 60 분 segment on Remote Area Medical, dealing with the millions of uninsured and underinsured in America.
video
politics
political
토론
health care
remote area medical
60 분
added by Sappp
video
atheism
creationism
god
religion
바나나
Just fucking watch it.
video
politics
george w 부시, 부시 대통령은
war
facts
iraq
civilians
soldiers
murder
added by MajorDork74
Source: CafèPress.com