Guys! I need your opinion/thoughts. Please see.

I think it's about showing your unique part at job interviews. But that mostly depends on the kind of job you're applying for. For journalism, the employers mostly seek a unique point of view. But in jobs like programming 또는 banking, they just take a look at your educational history then decide if 당신 get the job 또는 don't.
Speaking for myself, I want to be a graphic designer 또는 a programmer, and for this I'm trying to get into a good school.
Life's cruel. And so are job interviews. And bosses.

Ehhhhh. I think it's a misconception that schooling is 더 많이 important to employers than attributes. I think people use it as a measure to reflect intelligence level, like if 당신 went to Harvard 또는 옥스퍼드, 옥스포드 you're obviously mad smart, but not as a marker for other skills.

My dad does a lot of interviewing for interns and potential employees for his company and I know he does have certain stereotypes, but always he puts personality first. The stereotypes do tend to have basis though, like Harvard, Yale, Stanford kids may be 더 많이 cut-throat whereas Ivy kids from Columbia 또는 Penn are 더 많이 laid back. In general. But still, people judge 더 많이 on attributes. That is what interviewing is for, 당신 know? So that the employers can see what kind of people skills the applicants have and what they know. If they judged just 또는 mostly from what school they went to then they wouldn't even waste the time interviewing. So someone from a slightly worse school is probably going to be hired over an Ivy kid if they have better abilities.