Sirius Black and Jacob Black?

1. Sirius Black is an animagus. Remus Lupin is a werewolf. There's a difference!
2. I'm pretty sure Harry Potter was written before Twilight, in the 1990s, therefore, they cannot rip off Twilight.
3. Harry Potter isn't cheap 또는 a rip off. The story is intensely complex. Try replicating that, Meyer.
4. Because Harry Potter's better than Twilight. Deal with it.

*cough* unoriginal *cough*

1. 당신 have horrible grammar. Corrections: I 사랑 Twilight, it's the best 사랑 story ever. I have all the books, and everything! One day, I was 읽기 Harry Potter and this guy, Sirius Black, turns into a werewolf. THEY TOTALLY RIPPED OFF TWILGHT. Jacob and his gang were 늑대인간 first. Then, the writer didn't even think to change the last name of the character she stole! UGH! So the real 질문 is, "Why do people like Harry Potter better than Twilight? It's just a cheap ripoff."

2. For the answer to this question, I would usually ask 당신 to do some research about the time that the 책 were written, why J.K. Rowling is millions of dollars richer than the writer of Twilight, and the difference between 늑대인간 and animagi. However, since 당신 have grammar that shows that 당신 are too stupid to do that, I will tell you! I did some research and found this. Perhaps it will help 당신 educate yourself.


Eldridge, 15, 가필드 High School

Q: Why do 당신 prefer "Harry Potter" to "Twilight"?

A: The "Harry Potter" series is a complex, original story of adventure with a lot of 판타지 elements, including an entire made-up world coexisting alongside our own. "Twilight" is really a romance novel, not fantasy, and hardly deserves to be treated as such. One major reason I prefer "Harry Potter" is the character development: "Twilight" characters develop minimally 또는 not at all, whereas in "Harry Potter" characters grow and mature along with the reader, bringing him/her deeper into the story.

Q: How does Rowling's 글쓰기 surpass Meyer's?
A: Stephenie Meyer's style is very straightforward; the vocabulary is basic, there are almost no hidden clues concealed in the 글쓰기 to foreshadow future events. It is extremely bland and repetitive. J.K. Rowling, on the other hand, writes simply enough that a 10 년 old can enjoy it, but includes subtle humor and references that older teens/adults appreciate. An example: The character of Remus Lupin, the werewolf, is named after the story of Remus and Romulus, two boys supposedly raised 의해 늑대 who later founded Rome, and the Latin term for 늑대 (lupus). This extra level of complexity makes Harry Potter appealing to many adults as well as kids.

Q: Identify a theme in "Harry Potter" that speaks to 당신 strongly.
A: I find the theme of 사랑 to be the most interesting and deeply explored. Unlike 사랑 in "Twilight," the 사랑 featured in the Potter 책 is much 더 많이 than romance; it is a 사랑 for family, 프렌즈 and everyone in the world. It is 사랑 that drives Harry's mother to die for him, Snape to switch sides, and Harry to try to sacrifice himself in the hopes of weakening Voldemort. The idea of doing something for the greater good, just because 당신 사랑 everyone and want to protect them from harm, is a powerful concept

I hope this got into your idiotic brain.
Love,
Snowy

your a fucking idiot. I have my reasons.
1. SIRIUS BLACK IS NOT A WEREWOLF. He is an animagus, which is a person who can change into animal. Sirius can change into a dog, not a werewolf. 2. That's Remus Lupin, duh. 당신 would know that is 당신 actually READ IT.
3. New Moon 또는 some shit came out in 2006. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Askaban came out in 1999. So, if anything, TWILIGHT RIPPED OFF HARRY POTTER.
4. I know this is an opinion, but Twilight is cheesy and stupid, and doesn't deserve to be read, especially 의해 idiots like you.

First of all, Sirius is an animagus, and doesn't turn into a werewolf he turns into a dog. Next, harry potter 책 came out way before the twilight books, so if anyone copied it was the writer of twilight, so get your facts straight if 당신 want to post this all over the Internet

Ok how is twilight better than harry potter. twilight is some silly 사랑 story about a vampire and a human were the ending of the story gave me no feelings at all. I mean i didnt get the feels man. THE WHOLE FRIKIN THING WAS A DREAM! there was no sacrifice shown, no acts of love, no trying to defeat the great evil. Harry potter was an entire world of magic and 사랑 and friendship and had tons of amazing characters with lots of different personalities (including Sirius, who isnt a werewolf and is nothing like jacob) also the ending of Harry Potter shows how there friendship and family at hogwarts could band togather to defeat the great evil, and yes people gave there lives for this on the way, and i cried, that doesn't happen in twilight(ex. Cedric, Sirius (bet Jacob never did that), Dumbledor, Snape, James, Lily, 프레드 (and he and George did literally everything together, can 당신 imagine how awful that must have been for George), Remus, Tonks, Moody, EVEN HEDWIG and she's an owl. thats why ppl like Harry potter better to anwer your question

You're right. They totally took the plot and just tweaked some details, so it wouldn't be THAT noticeable! Jacob Black is the greatest werewolf of all time. The ripoff Sirius Black doesn't have a chance. Like, first book came out only 5 years ago, but he appears in 3rd book. It's clearly taken from Twilight. :|

*Blaine when he read this question*

Please tell me you're trolling.

뱀파이어 dont sparkle. twilight sucks. and NOTHING WAS RIPPED OFF 당신 IDIOT!!!!

Lupin turns into a werewolf, 당신 idiot. -_-

Too much talking for Harry Potter and Twilight, so...

DIE B*TCH DIE!

This is the best 사랑 story ever:

.

사과 브랜디 and 무지개, 레인 보우 dash, still a better 사랑 story than twilight.

Um,Excuse me Bitch? Twilight is a rip off.Im pretty sure that Harry Potter was written first.Sirius Black is way better than that dumb as werewolf Jacob Black!Get it right,Bitch!!!

Im a massive 팬 of both Harry potter and twilight but Hun Harry potter was published before twilight therefore if anybody copied it was Stephanie Meyer.

Cheap ripoff? No, not even close. It's way better than Twilight, and it can't copy Twilight because IT CAME FIRST. So if anything, Twilight is ripping off of Harry Potter with that last name.

actually harry potter was written long before twilight so it couldn't have ripped it off unless JK Rowling owned time machine.
If anything Twilight ripped off harry potter.

WHAT IS UP WITH THESE 질문 COMING FROM YAHOO ANSWERS. I SAW THIS 질문 ALREADY.

Good god. Are 당신 an idiot? If 당신 aren't, you're at the right way.
If there's one story who ripped off, it's Twilight, because HP came out first. And above all, Sirius isn't a werewoulf, he's a dog. Lupin is a werewoulf.

Harry Potter was first your statement is incorrect and 늑대인간 change once a month, Sirius is an animagus, Jacob Black is NOT a werewolf. Harry Potter was not cheap. It's worth MILLIONS and the twilight 뱀파이어 are Not even vampires. If 당신 want cool 뱀파이어 then watch 'The 로스트 Boys 1987'

U need to choose your priorities!!!

Are 당신 a dumbfound Muggle!!!??? Sirius is an animagus, and he turned into a DOG. Remus is a werewolf (far better than Jacob was) and his last name was Lupin. + twilight came after Harry Potter, so its stefanie whatever who 스톨, 훔친 the idea of a werewolf (that too done in a wrong way)
So its better 당신 go back to liking twiiiilight, because Harry Potter is something that a muggle like 당신 won't understand :) kuch bhi kya....

First of all idiot Sirius is a Animagus and Harry Potter And the Prisoner of Askaban was realised on September 8th 1999 so Harry Potter came first so she copied J.K Rowling! And your wrong again Hermione and Ron is the best 사랑 story because they met in first 년 and they started off with Ron thinking she was a know it all then at the end while searching for horcrux's (Fighting again the freaking dark lord!) they realise they don't want to leave each other and end up having kids together. 또는 it's Luna and Neville. Both picked on finding common ground and in the end when they might die Neville declares his 사랑 for her.

Who ever wrote the twilight 책 ripped off J.K.Rowling. She wrote the HP 책 way before the first twilight book came out. The HP movie came out a 년 before 당신 book did. If anything 당신 sparkly twilight obsessed person, your writer 스톨, 훔친 from J. K. Rowling

I can tell 당신 something is wrong with you, have 당신 bothered to check when Harry Potter was released? The 책 were release 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2003, 2005 and 2007 and twilight 책 were 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 and if I'm correct Sirius appeared in the prisoner of azkaban which is the 3rd book released in 1999 plus Black is a common name to be used. But 당신 got your facts wrong.

Anyway does it even matter who came first? NO ITS JUST A FLIPPING BOOK

First of all, Sirius is an Animagus, NOT a werewolf. Remus Lupin is a werewolf. Second, Harry Potter was published BEFORE Twilight, so if anything, Twilight is a ripoff of Harry Potter. And I 사랑 both series a lot.

The HP 책 came out before the Twighlight books, so technically it would have been Twilight ripping off HP. ARE 당신 STUPID?! If 당신 were really 읽기 the book 당신 would have known that Sirius was an animagus. Lupin is a werewolf. Jacob is a werewolf according to the Twilight series. If the last name was ripped off it was from HP originally

Guys, this obviously isn't a serious question.

No. Harry Potter was written BEFORE Twilight. Not after, 또는 else it would be a ripoff, but, no, HP was written first.

Are 당신 an idiot? For one, Sirius Black is an Animagus, not a werewolf, and two- HARRY POTTER WAS MADE BEFORE TWILIGHT 당신 IDIOT!!! Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban was published in freaking 1999. Freaking Twilight was published in 2005. Don't believe me? 구글 IT!Whose the rip-off now idiot? Also Sirius Black is 10 times the man Jacob Black will ever be. So stick you're head in a toilet, jerk.

Are 당신 aware that the release of the first Harry Potter novel was eight years before the apperance of the first twilight book?
Sirius Black was entirely described in 1999, so still six years before Jacob Black.So who do 당신 think is the "cheap ripp off"?

Please check your facts. Almost every single fact that 당신 wrote about 'Harry Potter' is incorrect. 1)Sirius Black is an animagus and turns into a shaggy, black dog. 2)'Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban', the book that introduced Sirius Black, was released a 년 before 'Twilight' was released. So that makes it impossible for there to be any 'ripoffs' as 당신 called it. 3) People like Harry Potter better than Twilight because it was passed down through generations, it is a story that has many morals, it is about friendship and happiness. Twilight is about 사랑 and romance (don't get me wrong I have soft spot for romance novels).

Actually the third Harry Potter book was released before the Twilight books, most of the Harry Potter 책 were made before the Twilight ones. In other words Sirius was introduced before Jacob was.

당신 do realize Harry Potter came out first right?

And Black is such a common surname. Last names that common aren't copywriten.

Harry Potter and the Prisioner of Azkaban was published in 1997. Your dumb 나귀, 엉덩이 twilight book was published in 2005. Therefore, if one was a ripoff of the other (which isn't the case), twilight would be the ripoff.

Actually, J.K. Rowling didn't 'steal' anything from Stephanie. Harry Potter was released in 1998. whilst Twilight was in 2005. So it's like Stephanie got the idea from Harry Potter. And also, Sirius isn't a werewolf, Remus is. His Animagus form is a black dog, which he can transform into at will. Harry Potter is not a cheap ripoff of Twilight. THERE IS LITERALLY NOTHING ALIKE IN THE TWO SERIES.

Did 당신 read the 책 correctly?
Number 1: Sirius Black is NOT A WEREWOLF!!!!! Yes, 당신 read that correctly. A werewolf is someone who loses control every 월 DURING THE COMPLETE RISING OF THE FULL MOON and becomes a deadly NEAR-WOLF. Sirius Black is not a werewolf, he is merely an animagus. Remus Lupin is a werewolf. An animagus is a person who can transform into an animal at will.
Number 2: Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban was published in 1999. The FIRST Twilight book was published in 2005. Stalker Meyer 또는 whatever copied Harry Potter. GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT, 당신 FILTHY MUDBLOODS. Whoever 게시됨 that, 당신 are Riddikulus.

Okay, please inform yourself before 당신 blame jk Rowling for a rip-off!
So first Sirius Black isn’t a werewolf but a animagus (that means he can change into a animal whenever he want) and his animal is a freakin dog and not a werewolf.
초 Harry Potter came out first (first book released 1997, the third book(it’s mostly about Sirius) came out 1999.The first book of twilight came out 2005, so if then twilight is the ,,cheap ripoff“ (and I don’t think so)
Third:Harry Potter has nothing to do with twilight it’s a whole other story about wizards.So how could it be a ,,cheap ripoff“?!
And to answer your question: Because Harry Potter is like the best book/Movie ever and it’s just than twilight (sorry to all the twilight fans, I 사랑 twilight too but Harry Potter is just better.)

Go to school. Twilight was made around the 2005’s, while Harry Potter was created 의해 (our Queen,) Joanne Rowling. Ste-(why do I even wanna say her name?) copied off of Sirius.

Oh, my God 당신 are dumb. Harry Potter was NOT a rip off from that garbage. There is nothing to compare between them because for your information, that whiney moron was a wolf, Sirius Black was an animagus and not a werewolf. Don't judge something 당신 have no knowledge about and again fyi Harry Potter was written loooong before Twilight. It is not a rip off. I don't understand how people are still comparing the two. The 글쓰기 also was so much better than Twilight which as I said is garbage. And also if 당신 wanted to piss people off who especially are Harry Potter fans, then congratualtions it worked.

HARRY POTTER CAME FIRST!!!!!!!! TWILIGHT COPIED HARRY POTTER!!!!!!!! AND SIRIUS BLACK DOESN’T TURN INTO A WEREWOLF!!!!!! HE TURNS INTO A BLACK DOG WHENEVER HE WANTS TO!!!!!!!!!! A WEREWOLF IS FORCED!!!!!!!!! IF 당신 TRULY LIKED TWILIGHT, WHICH I DON’T, 당신 WOULD KNOW THAT JACOB AND HIS GANG TURN INTO 늑대 AT WILL, NOT WEREWOLVES, 당신 DOOFUS!!!!!!!!!!

1. Sirius black is an animagus, a wizard that has the ability to turn into a animal and back, his animagus is a dog not a wolf.

2. The actual werewolf is Remus lupin aka moony, A werewolf is someone who, once a month, loses all grip on sanity and becomes a violent murderous monster.

3.jacob and his pack are technically Animagi, since they can turn 또는 "phase" at will.

4.the book of Prisoner of askaban came out in 1999 and The first twilight book came out in 2005, so technically twilight would be the rip off, get your facts straight before commenting stupidity like this.

THANK YOU! 😊