I don't even think it's super popular/famous right now.
Harry potter doesn't have its own amusement park, it has a small section in a very large amusement park.
Peter pan has its own amusement park rides also, but it's not super popular/famous.
Yeah, I agree with cassie on this one. The only people that will keep Harry Potter popular are us (90's kids/Potter generation).
By the time we grow old then Harry Potter's hype will probably die down. It won't become totally irrelevant but it won't be as popular as it is now. And if you haven't noticed, Harry Potter's lime light is starting to die down now that the films and books are over, same goes for Twilight. Hunger Games will come and go, then something else will come and go, then something else, it'll go on forever. The only way Potter can every become as big as it was before is if they remake the films (and I REALLY do not want that!).
And, no offense, kids now don't value good films. I still wonder how Jack and Jill won best film at the Kids Choice Awards over Hugo and Tin Tin (even though those two films weren't even nominated). Young boys want explosions and robots. Young girls want shirtless men and pansy popstars. Kids don't care about movies with morals and value anymore, Why do you think there hasn't been a good Disney movie since Lilo and Stitch 2001 (or 2)?
You need an Islands of Adventure ticket to get into the wizarding world of Harry Potter rides.
You need a Disneyland/world ticket to get onto Peter Pan rides.
It's the same thing.
Unless you're referring to time Return tickets. You don't have to pay for those. They're given to you for free when the section has reached it's fire safety capacity limit.
I think Harry Potter may live to be a classic, just like Macbeth, Oliver Twist, David Copperfield. Although not many people know them, they're still very famous. Perhaps Harry Potter would be like that.
There's a difference between something that will "still be super popular/famous" and still well known. I'm sure it will become a children's classic. I wouldn't go as far as putting it up there with Macbeth (by a long shot) but it would hold itself up well amongst such classics as Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, The Chronicles Of Narnia, The Hobbit, etc.
Of course it will. It's a fact that it has an amusement park. The books are the third most read after the bible and IKEA catalogues (lol) so obviously it will stay famous in 50 years. I agree with Helena-B-Carter.
@missdada actually, I LOVE Harry Potter and I picked no :/ So what if it isn't 'the thing' anymore. I still love it, and I'll pass it down to my kids. Maybe they'll love at as much as I do :)
Who are you talking to? I already said that.
I do strongly believe that in order to even consider the possibility of choosing know, you can't be absorbed enough to find yourself required to pick yes.
It's an opinion, but it's a very strong and reasonable opinion. It's not some passive "I like pink" opinion.
That's what I meant by partially.
I don't think it will be "super popular / famous" in years to come, hell, I don't really think it's that now.. The hype has definitely died down and it is hardly heard of now on the television or anywhere like that.. I do not doubt that it will still be popular and well known, but not the description there..
Harry potter doesn't have its own amusement park, it has a small section in a very large amusement park.
Peter pan has its own amusement park rides also, but it's not super popular/famous.
And it is its own amusement park. You have to buy its own ticket. You dont have to buy a ticket just for Peter Pan.
By the time we grow old then Harry Potter's hype will probably die down. It won't become totally irrelevant but it won't be as popular as it is now. And if you haven't noticed, Harry Potter's lime light is starting to die down now that the films and books are over, same goes for Twilight. Hunger Games will come and go, then something else will come and go, then something else, it'll go on forever. The only way Potter can every become as big as it was before is if they remake the films (and I REALLY do not want that!).
And, no offense, kids now don't value good films. I still wonder how Jack and Jill won best film at the Kids Choice Awards over Hugo and Tin Tin (even though those two films weren't even nominated). Young boys want explosions and robots. Young girls want shirtless men and pansy popstars. Kids don't care about movies with morals and value anymore, Why do you think there hasn't been a good Disney movie since Lilo and Stitch 2001 (or 2)?
You need a Disneyland/world ticket to get onto Peter Pan rides.
It's the same thing.
Unless you're referring to time Return tickets. You don't have to pay for those. They're given to you for free when the section has reached it's fire safety capacity limit.
^Oh I didnt know that. I havent gone yet. I just went off what my friend had told me.
In my school HP is still really big so maybe thats why im thinking like this. We have tons of potterheads!
And of course Twilight fans will pick 'no'.*Rolls eyes*
..Which is really childish by the way.
My opinion that being able to click no means you are not being blinded by your love and adoration? Only partially.
and cassie 1-2-3,if u dont even want it to be famous
get the hell out of here!!
That's not an opinion,she made it a fact,and it's not.
I do strongly believe that in order to even consider the possibility of choosing know, you can't be absorbed enough to find yourself required to pick yes.
It's an opinion, but it's a very strong and reasonable opinion. It's not some passive "I like pink" opinion.
That's what I meant by partially.
Here, I've copied and pasted it for you:
"My opinion that Harry Potter fans have clicked no? It's not, in reality.
My opinion that being able to click no means you are not being blinded by your love and adoration? Only partially. "
코멘트를 추가하려면 로그인하거나 팬팝에 가입하세요