People say that Twilight is better than Harry Potter because Twilight has Robert Pattinson, Harry Potter and the Goblet of 불, 화재 Movie has Robert Pattinson in it too! Therefore Harry Potter is better! 코멘트 on this if 당신 have noticed that!

OH DEAR GOD! MAKE IT STOP! I would rather have teeth surgery than hear 더 많이 about Twilight. It is the most annoying, god awful piece of shit I have ever heard of. I'm sorry. But if twihards haven't heard of overexposure 의해 now they wouldn't know the meaning of that word if it hit them square in the face. Rob isn't cute at all. Sorry he looks like a druggie who doesn't shower. And Cedric in GOF, I don't know he doesn't look like the same guy. I think he is ugly and that this series is some kind of brain washing cult. I don't get, I just don't. I am as girly as the 다음 woman and like romance myself. But I fell asleep in chapter one.

Harry Potter has been around for 14yrs. Has sold over hundreds of millions of copies in 67 languages and has made 5.4 Billion dollars, got kids to read again and has a Theme Park at Universal. I don't know why there is competition when the winner is as plain as the eye can see.

Twihards have OCD= Obsessive Cullen Disorder and need shock therapy.

Of couse I've noticed that, who hasn't? Kind of ironic that he was also in Harry Potter, which makes that quite an invalid reason. 당신 know what I find kind of funny about that? Robert Pattinson dosent even like Twilight! He said he enjoyed portraying Cedric 더 많이 than he enjoyed portraying Edward.

It makes no sense for them to use that as a reason. Harry Potter is indeed better than Twilight. :D

I agree with your reasoning, but I think that Robert Pattison sucks. Hes not a very good actor, and is ugly to boot.
Just saying, so seriously, Harry Potter is better ANYWAYS!!
And Harry Potter has Bellatrix!! She is EPIC!

I found a flaw in your reasoning. 당신 say that Pattinson is in both Twilight and GoF, yet 당신 say HP is better. Wouldn't that make HP and Twilight the same 의해 that statement? But I get what 당신 mean.

I've actually never had someone tell me (or seen recently on the spots I frequent) that Twilight is better because it has Rob Pat. I've heard them say because "he's hott!!11", which, as he looks completely different in each movie, I can see where they'd get that.

의해 your logic: Harry Potter and Twilight would be the same because they both have Rob Pat.. One wouldn't be any better 또는 worse then the other.

oh please, Harry Potter had Robert Pattinson before everyone was going mad about him, so there for we win, enough said, and anyway, its basically a war between awesome as witches and wizards against pathetic sparkling wannabe vampires

I guess Twihards think he looks better when he hasn't showered for a couple of weeks.

And they have "more" Rob (which I don't see how it's a good thing, but oh well, just me)

The way I see it, Twihards using Robert Pattinson as a reason makes HP better 의해 default.

Harry Potter being better than Twilight has NOTHING to do with Robert Pattinson.

Also... I'm 더 많이 about comparing the books, personally.

Okay, Robert Pattinson has NOTHING,I repeat,NOTHING to do with Harry Potter's major success.Harry Potter's famous because of the great storylines,the amazing plots,the awesome characters who 당신 just have to love.And about the actor's who play the characters,I know a lot of Twilight 팬 will consider them as not hot,but at least their roles didn't depend on their hotness.They were actually chosen for their talent.

Sorry for the 캡, 모자 locks ;)

I suppose, but it's not much of a win. He's still a horrible actor and I found it impossible to cry in movie 4. I just laughed. :P .. Oh, well. R.I.P Cedric Diggory (Harry still won, so HA!)