^ There is a difference between "corruption" and "treason"... do you mean treasonous people shouldn't talk about treason?
This question... confuses me...
"nearly found evidence" suggests that no evidence was found...? So this ranges from strong theories to gossip really, doesn't it...?
Serious allegations of treason should be investigated, even if hypocrisy rears its ugly head. People who have actually committed treason, or have had to prove they haven't, might actually be in a position to provide a lot a guidance for how to proceed in a particular case.
What people who commit treason probably shouldn't be doing is weighing in on the punishments for treason.
The reason I don't think the corrupt should have the right to talk about treason is that it could lead to someone being a scapegoat for a crime they didn't commit.
This question... confuses me...
"nearly found evidence" suggests that no evidence was found...? So this ranges from strong theories to gossip really, doesn't it...?
Serious allegations of treason should be investigated, even if hypocrisy rears its ugly head. People who have actually committed treason, or have had to prove they haven't, might actually be in a position to provide a lot a guidance for how to proceed in a particular case.
What people who commit treason probably shouldn't be doing is weighing in on the punishments for treason.
코멘트를 추가하려면 로그인하거나 팬팝에 가입하세요