What do you think? Place your vote!
(Placed your vote already? Remember to login!)

랜덤 Thumbs up if 당신 consider this a cynical viewpoint: Arguing one crime to be too frequent for a character to be a CM/PE.

3 fans picked:
Yes.
   67%
No
   33%
 MisterH posted over a year ago
Make your pick! | next poll >>
save

1 comment

user photo
MisterH picked Yes.:
Bear in mind that wisdom and cynicism are two different things.
Same goes for cynicism and maturity.

CM is short for complete monster and PE is short for Pure Evil.

Now for potential flaws regarding this viewpoint:
* My personal belief is that making this sort of argument without actually taking into consideration how often has a CM/PE candidate committed a certain crime and how many victims he had claimed in said crimes onscreen, which I kinda find a foolish argument to make.

* Another thing is that arguing a character not to count because of other characters who have committed the same crime without considering their actual amount of times they have done that crime, their victim count, or their resources.

For example, a character who destroyed a universe should not have to compete with a character who destroyed only one planet onscreen with the same resources. The problem with the competition is that the person destroying the universe might blow the planet destroyer out of the water.

Another issue is a character who had ELIMINATED many child lives having to compete with characters who only had eliminated like one or two child lives onscreen.
posted over a year ago.
last edited over a year ago