ahem. try not to laugh.
1. Robert Pattinson, can 당신 say HOT? And he's totally sexy when he sparkles!
So? Hotness has absolutely no correlation to 연기 ability. He was also in Harry Potter first.
2. Taylor Lautner, I mean, have 당신 SEEN those muscles?
NOT HOT. Strange nose, closed up eyes and no 연기 ability. That is just my personal opinion. As I said, hotness has no correlation to 연기 ability.
3. Kristen Stewart. An extremely talented and beautiful actress, with loads of potential.
Ugly and emotionless. No talent whatsoever. IMO.
4. The Volturi. REALISTIC villains, instead of insane freaks in cloaks, like Voldemort and the Death Eaters.
The Volturi wear cloaks too, 당신 dumbass. And they are 뱀파이어 which isn't anymore realistic than wizards because they are both fictional. Please explain your reasoning on this.
5. Because its just common sence to like twilight!!! Haha. Romance means everything. Bella and Edward are like, MENT 4 each other, and everything is just......PERFECT!! In Harry potter, u would that that harry and harmonie would like...fall in 사랑 또는 something....and then u watch people die in freaky ways, and then there are creepy things....GAHH!!! but yea. (:
Firstly, your spelling may signify how intelligent 당신 are, so I would recommend proofreading when trying to get a point across. Romance does not mean everything. That is a horrible message to send out to the pre-teens who watch twilight. It makes them believe they need a boyfriend to be capable people, and girls should learn to be independent because they do not need men. Also the whole beauty of Harry Potter is that it is unexpected and J.K. Rowling isn't afraid to kill off her characters 또는 put them in unexpected relationships, because that is how REAL LIFE WORKS.
6. Because it's one of the greatest 사랑 stories ever!! Harry Potter is good too, but Twilight has way 더 많이 romance and 더 많이 hot guys....EDWARD, JASPER, EMMETT, CARLISLE!! Need I say more!
As I said, hotness has no correlation to 연기 ability. And Harry Potter has hot guys too. Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), Ron (Rupert Grint), Draco (Tom Felton) and CEDRIC (ROBERT PATTINSON)
7. Yes, we all know that Harry Potter and Twilight are both fiction, but Twilight is clearly better. When I read a book, I like to imagine myself in the plot 또는 relate to the story somewhat. Aside from the vampire theme, Twilight actually takes place in a REAL town with up to 날짜 things. ex) cars, school, etc. I'm sorry but I just can't picture myself on a flying train, eating 초콜릿 covered frogs, headed to a non existent magical school. In my opinion, Twilight is obviously better.
Harry Potter takes place in the real up-to-date world as well, if 당신 haven't noticed but it does not happen in the non-wizard world. It happens in the wizard world where they have magic and do not need electronics 또는 anything.Do 당신 think the Volturi use ipads in their free time 또는 spend them in ancient libraries/weird ancient vampire cult meetings? Thought so.
8. OMGGG Harry POtter is messed up. Like seriusly, he needs to grow up and stop being so boring cuz edward is like waaaaaaay 더 많이 AMAZINNNG. therees no 사랑 in hary potter and nobodies hot who wants to read a book without hot peeps?
AGAIN, hotness has no correlation to 연기 ability and it doesn't matter. Harry Potter has realistic 사랑 as well. Who gets married in high school and falls in 사랑 as soon as they meet? Ron and Hermione have a friendship FIRST as most REAL relationships do. It develops so beautifully to show a truthful portrayal of childhood love. Its awkward and unexpected just like real love. I'm sorry 당신 can't see that. Maybe the fact 당신 so fiercely defend the romanticized notions of love, for example 사랑 at first sight and sparks flying, comes from being a late bloomer/loveless in your teen years. Just a thought.
9. Each book in the twilight series has a different story line. It is mainly about Bella's Lovestory but in the 1st book it was about how Edward had to save Bella and in each book the story changes. The main reason of the book is for Bella To become A vampire. Then after that it is the story with Renesmee. In Harry Potter it takes 7 또는 8 책 to get to the point. Killing the one who must not be named. it drags on and on and becomes boring.
I don't even understand how 당신 can say that. I can not tell any of the twilight 책 apart because 1. I don't care and 2. they are all exactly the same thing. They are pretty formulaic and they are the ones that drag on. I don't think 당신 have ever seen Harry Potter 또는 Twilight.
10. Twilight has a 더 많이 reasonable plot than HarryPotter. Look at Harry and you'll see he's 더 많이 angsty than Bella. And all the Harry Potter 책 are like Harry being "My life sucks" and then Voldemort shows up and he's like "I'm going to kill you" and Harry's all like "No way" and then Harry wins in the end. It's way obvious, especially when the author already tells 당신 how many 책 there's going to be. I mean, why can't we live in total suspense on what's going to happen next? Twilight gives that suspense that something amazing is going to happen that Harry Potter never gave us. Plus, Harry Potter is a wizard and wizards are demonic creatures. Who would want to root for a demon as the good guys? In twilight, everyone's a vampire, and 뱀파이어 aren't Satan's spawn.
EVERYTHING 당신 JUST SAID IS WRONG. 뱀파이어 ARE (IF 당신 HAVE EVER READ A BOOK EVER 당신 WOULD KNOW THIS) CONSIDERED DEMONIC AND SATANIC. IN VAMPIRE LEGEND, 뱀파이어 CAN NOT STEP ON HOLY GROUND, BECAUSE THEY ARE THE DEAD LIVING AND THEREFORE ENEMIES OF GOD. BUT THAT DOESN'T MATTER BECAUSE RELIGION IS A STUPID THING TO MENTION ON A WEBSITE BECAUSE IT COULD EXCLUDE PEOPLE OF OTHER RELIGIONS AS WELL AS BEING COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT. CAN 당신 GET IT THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULL THAT THERE IS 더 많이 THAN ONE RELIGION? AND IF 당신 MUST ASSUME THERE IS ONLY ONE, AT LEAST DO YOUR DAMN RESEARCH ON IT. Ok, sorry for the outburst, but honestly 당신 must be just pushing my buttons. Let me address each of your dumb points: 1. As far as I can see, how reasonable the plot of each story is, is irrelevant, at least if 당신 look at the plots in literal ways, seeing as they are both about the paranormal. 2. The angsty-ness is a matter of opinion, but I think all of Bella's problems are self made and all she does is bumble and moan over them. 3. Is there anything in Twilight that is unpredictable? I think not. 4. Well, the last point was handled up above.
11. In harry potter all they do is fly around on brooms and kill people with magic sticks (wands) I mean, really?
Harry Potter is a complex and in-depth story that has much 더 많이 hidden meaning than 당신 could ever understand. In twilight all they do is run around without shirts, fighting over a stupid, confused adolescent girl.
12. Edward wasn't a dork. Yeah, sometimes, dorks are cute. However, Harry was a bit too dorky and I can't see why girls even liked him.
He had this amazing thing called a personality. He had layers and complexity. And he's hot. That's why girls like him.
13. Harry Potter is for virgin nerds. Twilight is for cool and mature people.
First of all 당신 are a virgin nerd. And Twilight has absolutely nothing below the surface. 당신 see one twilight movie and 당신 know everything. It is simple and for dumbasses like you. Twilight is for boobless, hormone-crazed, pre-pubescent girls. Like you. Its sad 당신 think maturity is as simple as sexualization.
14. Hermione is a week character. Unline Bella, who struggles every day. Hermione has no problems, the only things she has are self-created. She follows Harry into his troubles. Big whoop. Even if she is teased about being a mud blood 또는 whatever its called, she has a choice. She could quit Hogwarts 또는 something. Bella has no choice, she is in love.
OK, you quit school. Like right now. No big whoop, right? That's what Hermione did. Bella, on the other hand, has so many choices and yet she is incapable to function without her sparkling boyfriend. She threw herself off a cliff when he left. Just so she could get his attention and so he would come back. That is so unrealistic. In real life is she would be checked into a mental hospital for mental instability and severe dependence issues.
15. Twilight was a best selling novel, and has a bigger 팬 base than Harry Potter.
link
Actually, Harry Potter's least 인기 movie made 더 많이 money than the Twilight 책 all together.
16. Stephenie Meyer writes that the only thing that can kill a vampire is another vampire 또는 a werewolf. Since Edward is a vampire created 의해 Meyer, we can use her written characteristics and apply them to Harry Potter. Since Harry Potter is neither vampire nor wolf, this means that Harry Potter could not kill Edward and Edward would win.
뱀파이어 don't exist. Neither do wizards. You're 연기 like a blood thirsty little 9 년 old who sets his action figures up in play-battle-to-the-deaths. But why would it matter if they fought? Physical strength of characters is a miniscule detail when comparing how good the book is. It shouldn't come into the equation. Even if Harry died he would have accomplished something in his life. It would have been a life worth living.
17. Twilight led to many other 수퍼내츄럴 romances in 책 and tv shows.
It started a trend. Because of 당신 retard fan-girls. Anyway, have 당신 heard of Anne Rice, Bram Stoker 또는 Joseph Sheridan Le Fanu? Stephanie Meyer didn't invent Vampires.
18. Unlike Harry, nobody's thoughts are actually that deep 또는 intellectual. I bet if any of us published our thoughts into a book, none would be great English lit; Bella's thoughts are 더 많이 realistic.
Actually, people's thoughts are like Harry's. And compared to most people he wouldn't be considered that smart. Which makes 당신 seem really stupid if 당신 think Harry Potter is complicated.
19. at least all of them dosent a scar of a lightning bolt.
Good one. That is a great reason. Seriously.
20. no witchcraft (practicing witchcraft is bad).
According to the TUDORS. Catch up with REALITY. Do 당신 know what 년 it is? 또는 are 당신 just a bible crazed impressionable youth who hasn't learnt to form an opinion yet? Either way, let me direct 당신 back to point number 10.
21. At least they talk about reliegon even 4 a short while.
And? Seriously? Even if they did (which I'm pretty sure they didn't) that would hardly be relevant. And also, Harry Potter teaches good values and characteristics that can be taught across many religions and different cultures. Traits that are important no matter of your background 또는 belief.
22. Twilight goes 더 많이 in depth with the emotions. 당신 can feel Bella's pain when Edward leaves her. 당신 can feel her confusion between Edward and Jacob. 당신 can feel her 사랑 for Renesmee.
ARE 당신 SERIOUS? Twilight has ZERO character development, empathy 또는 common sense to actions. What I mean is that it just says OMG I 사랑 HIM but doesn't show it 또는 make the watcher 또는 reader fall in 사랑 with him too.
The 연기 is also wooden and just plain bad. IMO
23. Twilight is a modern-day Romeo and Juliet in its themes of everlasting but forbidden love; to be compared to such a classic is an honor.
It has never been compared to that masterpiece. And HOW are they alike? People fall in love?!?!?! Yeah, that happens in just about every movie ever. Nothing else is the same. FORBIDDEN LOVE? That also is in just about every 사랑 story ever. That is basically the formula of every crap rom com Hollywood inflicts upon us every month.
24. We like the time setting of Twilight. It is modern day.
SO IS HARRY POTTER 당신 ALREADY SAID THAT.
25. 뱀파이어 stay with their partners will death. If 당신 mess with their partners, you'll get what's coming. Even after their partner is dead, they will remain loyal to them, till their time comes.
Real people 옮기기 on, experiment and change. Just like in Harry Potter. Twilight is so unrealistic. You're deluding yourself if 당신 think that's realistic. And also, where does it say that in Twilight?
26. We like and appreciate the fact that the 뱀파이어 and 늑대인간 in Twilight aren't anything like the one's from us before. To us, it's nice to take on the vampire and werewolf concept.
J.K. Rowling was so original she made up new creatures instead of using old ones. 뱀파이어 and 늑대인간 have been used so many times before and everyone is tired of it.
27. 당신 can read Twilight over and over again.
Not if 당신 want to keep your 음식 inside your stomach.
28. It is the rare vampire novel that isn't about sex on some level, and the Twilight 책 are no exception. What makes Meyer's 책 so distinctive is that they're about the erotics of abstinence. Their tension comes from prolonged, superhuman acts of self-restraint. There's a scene midway through Twilight, in which, for the first time, Edward leans in close and sniffs the aroma of Bella's exposed neck. "Just because I'm resisting the wine doesn't mean I can't appreciate the bouquet," he says. "You have a very floral smell, like lavender....or freesia." He barely touches her, but there's 더 많이 sex in that one paragraph than in all the snogging in Harry Potter.
Again, that is pointless. Good luck finding anyone ever like that. BUT this is one of the 더 많이 reasonable reasons which has evidence and support. But sex isn't something needed in a 사랑 story. I also want to point out that in Harry Potter, the characters are quite young, so their 사랑 will obviously be bumbling, awkward, clumsy 또는 something of that sort. Snogging is pretty normal at that age, and isn't supposed to have sexual tension. If anything its pretty realistic in the way its just a release of pubescent sexual frustration with little romance involved.
29. The characters change throughout the Twilight series as well. they may not be growing up like the Harry Potter Characters did, but they did change. The characters become 더 많이 brave, stronger, loving, forgiving, etc. Each character changed in the Twilight books. Harry Potter characters changed as well, but they kept some of their bad traits with them.
Of course they did. They were still the same people. In Twilight I have never once seen how they have changed. But Harry Potter is realistic and empathetic because people do keep their bad traits and aren't perfect, just like 당신 and me. 당신 know what, 당신 should visit this place called reality sometime soon. Its pretty jazzy.
30. IT has a graphic novel.
It has a comic book? Comic 책 are for children, and yet the 책 are about sex. Strange.
31. has 더 많이 female fans.
당신 mean hormone-crazed, ten 년 olds and sex-crazed, lonely mothers? Congrats.
32. Harry Potter was mainly focused on children. We are into the 더 많이 mature books. That have mature elements in them.
당신 think that mature elements are sex and love. That's it. That's all 당신 know about maturity. Harry Potter has multiple layers of friendships and connections and reflection and strength. Those topics are way 더 많이 mature than the ones in twilight because they are the characteristics of a strong, independent, mature adult. Its a typical teenager thing to say that sex and 사랑 are maturity because teenagers believe that they are adults, but they still have the minds of children.
33. Who wouldn't want two guys fighting over you? :D That just makes a good story. Am I right?
Not really. I don't think 당신 even understand what 당신 are saying, because toying with boys feelings is a horrible thing to do. And it also makes a bad story. Which Twilight has proven.
34. Bella 백조 is a strong character. SHe is brave, caring, forgiving, accepting, and just plain awesome :) She has risked her life many times to save someone she loves, such as Charlie, Renee, Edward, Jacob, The Cullens, Nessie, etc. She went through weeks of pain to save her daughter. SHe was willing to die so her baby could live. She has also formed a huge army and was prepared to fight till the death to protect her child and family. So yes, Bella is a role model. And No, she is not dependent on Edward.
Wrong. There are no examples of Bella having any of those characteristics. She risked her life for attention, not for others. She didn't form an army, people did it for her because they cared about her. I don't know why. She is very dependent on Edward.
35. Twilight totally had a better, richer, 더 많이 complex plot line than Harry Potter.
Wrong again. Harry Potter has MULTIPLE themes such as: The Value of Humility, The Occasional Necessity of Rebellion, The Dangers of Desire, Authority, The Importance of Friendship, Trust, Self-Reflection, Strength and Choosing to do the right thing. I could say more.
36. Alice Cullen. She is just awesome! She would probably be considered as the "Luna" in Twilight. Am I right? Alice would be the perfect sister. She would make anyone smile if they had a bad day.
We have a real Luna. AND Hermione.
37. All four Twilight 책 made us teary eyed. As for Harry Potter, some parts made us sad and a little teary, but Twilight was the one that really made us teary.
Wrong again. Twilight made people laugh. At the stupidity of it. Harry Potter made us cry, laugh, get angry, feel sympathy and most importantly feel empathy.
38. The Twilight 책 were so amazing!! We just could not put them down at all! For Harry Potter, some of the 책 we could not put down, but others made us a bit sleepy.
Thats a matter of opinion. and I think 당신 know mine.
39. Daniel Radcliffe is doing pornografic 뮤지컬 on Broadway and Robert Pattinson is 노래 and 연기 in other movies...who exactly got the better end of the deal?
Wrong again. All of robert's 영화 after twilight have flopped and been poorly rated. Daniel is in highly rated and anticipated movies, that are just as provocative as twilight. He is just exploring his 연기 abilities.
40. Sirius Black can turn into a great, black dog, Peter Pettigrew can turn into a rat, James Potter can turn into a stag, Remus Lupin a werewolf Rita Skeeter can turn into a beetle and Minerva Mcgonagall can turn into a cat. How scary is that?? Not at all. A Twilight shapeshifter would OWN them all :)
They aren't supposed to be scary 당신 dumbass. They have better things to do with being shapeshifters.
41. The HP 책 are all depressing. Lots of good characters die, which isn't cool. And they're just full of violance, and ridiculous plans.
Twilight is full of violence. Good people die in real life. ITS REALISTIC FOR THE MILLIONTH TIME. Unlike twilight.
42. Stephenie Meyer did her resarch and found a place like Forks so the 뱀파이어 could be outside. JK just made one up.
Stephanie Meyer didn't use any originality 또는 creativity. Unlike J.K. Rowling. I would go into that, but the only people worth talking to about this, already know it.
43. The sparkles are so unique and creative. They're not stupid.
No, they are stupid.
44. harry potter is too hard for a young child to read.
I managed and so did the rest of the world. I read it when I was 9. NEWSFLASH: 당신 MAY JUST BE STUPID. And although Twilight may be easy to read, due to its simple and uninspired 글쓰기 style, on WHAT earth would they be appropriate for young children?
45. Twilight is better because the 책 are written better and the characters bring 더 많이 to the 표, 테이블 for the readers.
Apparently Harry Potter is too hard for 당신 so what would 당신 know about good writing?
46. It's set in America.
Well it seems like you're running out of ideas.
America is essentially England. Because 당신 are all just English immigrants. Unless 당신 are native american. But we still created the english language and that is why it is called ENGLISH.
AND OF COURSE...................
Thank 당신 for your time.
LEARN HOW TO SPELL. READ A BOOK MAYBE. GROW UP AND GET REAL.
Read 더 많이 at ONTD: link
