이 질문에 답하기

해리 포터 질문

Who thinks that EMMA Watson couldve easily played Bella in Twilight (if she died her hair brown)??

I like Kristen, but im always wonderin' if Emma shouldve try'd 2get tha part!
 raven911 posted over a year ago
next question »

해리 포터 답변

volleyblue13 said:
I think she COULD'VE, but if that actually happened, (which it wouldn't because she's too busy filming Harry Potter) I would literally jump off a bridge!! Emma Watson is too good for Twilight :) haha
select as best answer
 I think she COULD'VE, but if that actually happened, (which it wouldn't because she's too busy filming Harry Potter) I would literally jump off a bridge!! Emma Watson is too good for Twilight :) haha
posted over a year ago 
*
I agree!
topez99 posted over a year ago
*
soo true LOL
luinwen posted over a year ago
*
nice picture and i totally agree way to good for twilihgt :D so tired of hearing about twilihgt
jedigal1990 posted over a year ago
XDRoseLuvsHP said:
Well, Emma acts a trillion bajillion times better than Kristen... haha. But I'm so glad Emma doesn't have anything to do with the Twilight 영화 at this point. She's better than that XD I think I would actually cry if any of the Harry Potter cast decided to go along with Twilight (I'm already sad Rob went to the dark side... but I don't even think he likes the books, so I guess that's okay)
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
wow thats so true! I would be depressed if she decided to go 2 Twilight after the series was over!
volleyblue13 posted over a year ago
*
... and now I despise Robert Pattinson...... ugh
volleyblue13 posted over a year ago
*
watever u guys r like blind 또는 sumtin cuz rob is WAY hott
soli24 posted over a year ago
vikkitehspiff said:
Oh god yes, Emma could have owned the part. I do like the other chick, but Emma is way 더 많이 experienced at acting. Although, after seeing her in Harry Potter, it would have been weird to see her in Twilight.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
renrae said:
Hell no.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
dustfinger said:
I can't see her do it. NO
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Flounder13 said:
If she wanted to insult intelligence and play the stupid and 더 많이 pathetic character. Hermione is 더 많이 sophisticated and smart, There is no way I would pick Bella 백조 over Hermione Granger. Besides Harry Potter is bigger than Twilight, whether twilighters and the media admit it 또는 not.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
so true!
volleyblue13 posted over a year ago
*
oh watever!!!!!!
soli24 posted over a year ago
nany5755 said:
SHE WOULD NOT PLAY BELLA UNLESS THE HELL FREEZES OVER
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
lauracullen66 said:
emma could have done a good job, though kristen was approached to do it. besides emaa doesnt have a american acceent so unless she could put one on like rob does...
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
elliejelly666 said:
I think she would have been way better than Kristen Stuart. Shes prettier, and a way better actress.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
soli24 said:
she cud not do it cuz she doesnt have an american acent nd kirsten stwuert is sooo perfect for the part no 1 cud replace her NO ONE!!!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
Kristen Stewart, and yes we know how 당신 guys obsess over every little detail in Twilight. Everything in Twilight is the World to you.
Flounder13 posted over a year ago
RpattzIsLove said:
Mmmmm...I've NEVER thought about that, but let's be diplomatic here, I believe neither Kristen could have handled Hermione & neither Emma would have fit Bella, so, each are playing very well their respective characters, but let's not mix things here. Although, I must admit, if it had happened, I'm sure Emma would've handled Bella's part beautifully!!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
next question »