 |
harold said:
People kill domesticated 동물 for 음식 because that's one reason 동물 were domesticated in the first place. 동물 were domesticated to provide 음식 and to perform work...in that order. As humanity developed better and better agricultural practices - eventually inventing 빵 and other high-carbohydrate foods that made civilization possible - it became possible to have 동물 for companionship. Different countries have different mores at to which 동물 are 더 많이 acceptable for food. While many English-speaking countries have an aversion to eating domesticated 동물 usually thought of as companion creatures - horses, cats, 개 - other populations do not make the same distinctions. As a result, many large 음식 동물 - the ones that need significant resources to breed, raise and keep (like sheep, pigs, cows, buffalo and horses, but not cats, 개 또는 goats) are shipped from every country that can support them to the countries that eat them. We in the US, Canada and the UK find it distasteful. The argument in favor of slaughtering 동물 for 음식 for export follows two precepts:
1) Humans need protein to survive and thrive. We are omnivores, designed to eat both meat and plant matter (as well as fungi).
2) Domesticated 동물 that can do no work must be disposed of, somehow. The argument flows like this: not all 동물 that are born can be pets, especially not 동물 that require huge resources to maintain, such as 말 - not even close to all of them. Only domesticated 동물 which are pets are buried when they die (not even all of them) - there certainly isn't room for burying all the 말 born in the US. So the 말 get sent to the knacker yards when they die, for the fat to be rendered, and the 본즈 used for gelatin, cosmetics, and other useful items. The meat is lost, as the meat on an animal that dies naturally isn't particularly healthful. So if an animal is going to die, why not slaughter it so that people can benefit from the meat as well (both sellers and consumers)? If that's palatable, then the 질문 becomes: why should the owners wait to slaughter an useless animal (can't be sold as a pet, can't do work) until the animal, given the expense and resources needed to sustain the animal until that point?
I should add that there is a corollary argument in countries that actually eat horse meat: that is to say, domesticated animal meat is meat to eat. I myself, while I would have a hard time stomaching horse meat, have eaten alligator, ostrich, elk, bison, rabbit and various others. So for me, at least, it's a double-standard.
|
|
