I think the 제목 gives it away a bit, but I quite frankly do not care.

Something I have been noticing lately is the lack of criticism in 코멘트 of art. Usually, everyone will give a generic compliment like awesome and cool, y'know, things that aren't very specific. Gradually, this is pissing me off, and for several reasons as well.

It is not constructive at all:
Listen, I would understand if it was something that is very good where 당신 cannot find any sort of fault, but that's only in Seuris's art. If 당신 genuinely find it to be perfectly executed, then go ahead and give it a generic and positive statement, but if 당신 do not, then 당신 need to give that person your opinion and what they need to work on with their art and how they could do it. That, my children, is called constructive criticism. It is essential to artists to improve on their art. it applies to nearly everything as well. If 당신 think 2 + 2 = 5, 당신 will think that until the end of time unless someone goes up and tells 당신 it's actually 6. Same thing with art.

It is not very interesting to read because of lack of detail:
If 당신 find a specific area 또는 an effect the artist used that 당신 quite enjoy, incorporate that into your opinion and 코멘트 on it. It's plain and quite quotidian to most artists if you're just like dude, liek dis iz ballin'. That's just fucking boring.

It shows you're not sincere with your actual intentions:
Saying something is just kewl shows to the artist 당신 don't really care about the work, even if that's not what 당신 truly feel. Seeming apathetic is a good thing to avoid.

It shows 당신 have a lack of appreciation for better words:
Okay, this is just me being a glossophiliac, but at least using words with 더 많이 syllables and that are used less will make 당신 seem a bit 더 많이 sophisticated and 사무용 겉옷, 전반적인 less of a mainstream moron.

An example I can think of is one shown link. As a artist deemed good 의해 the community, 당신 would think Danni would have something 더 많이 to say other than that. At least maybe something about the over-spacing. My 코멘트 involves my opinion, involving negativity mainly, but better to criticise than generically compliment. Granted, I did not give any advice, but it's mainly due to I have no experience drawing at all digitally, and barely traditionally. Danni, however, has very much experience and could've added a bit more, don't 당신 think?

I do not understand why artists don't help other artists too much with their works. There are some who actually to critique, but most just generically compliment, thinking their actually helping that artist. For example, as a writer, I make sure to point out misspellings, organization and 사무용 겉옷, 전반적인 originality. Basically, If 당신 know they can do better, then tell them. 당신 don't need to give them a paragraph, either. Just a sentence 또는 two could get your point across pretty well and will help them become better artists.

Also: Just because they're drawing and not recolouring, doesn't mean they deserve to not be given constructive criticism on their work. Don't even set recolouring to an unacceptable standard, it doesn't even belong on the scale.

I will conclude with this final message: 다음 time 당신 find some art 당신 see problems with, point it out in a respectable manner and if 당신 can, tell them how they can improve on it. You'll make a community of better artists and 사무용 겉옷, 전반적인 making the community better.