when 당신 go around 팬팝 당신 will see there is an obvious era of 디즈니 everyone's in favor of: The 90's but they are only successful because most of the members are from that era, they grew up with them and there for they think they are the best, and although that's great that they think so, that is far from successful economically.
Believe it 또는 not 신데렐라 is 더 많이 successful than The Little Mermaid, and Lady and the Tramp is 더 많이 successful than Aladdin. not 의해 much but still. this is exactly what I'm talking about. Many of the 디즈니 영화 of the late 30s- 60s are very well known but many people who didn't exist in that generation might say things like "its OK but its just old". when in fact many 영화 are very similar to others, Bambi and the Lion King, 신데렐라 and Aladdin, and every 디즈니 princess movie is very similar (they are all about a girl who wants something more). they just appeal to the audience of the generation more. with a few exceptions.
and one final note, remember what i said about monumentally successful, well here are some reviews of some very 인기 yet unsuccessful 또는 less that monumental 디즈니 영화 (from Rottontomatoes.com)
The Hunchback of Notre Dame-
"Considering that 디즈니 couldn't help but trash Victor Hugo's novel in the process of reforming it for tender young sensibilities, this animated adaptation of his Notre Dame de Paris is pricklier and 더 많이 disturbing than we had any right to expect."
Mulan-
"Memo to the gang at Walt 디즈니 animation: Your formula is showing."
Hercules-
[An] insipid, lifeless, animated feature.
Tarzan- " 디즈니 Studios seems to 사랑 the concept of feral children."
but 건초 half of the 디즈니 영화 that are in the 디즈니 둥근 천장, 금고 got reviews like these and look where they are today.
but be warned when 당신 have kids, don't be surprized if they say things like
"Beauty and the Beast is ok, but its just...... old, i don't get it, i like Tangled/ Frozen/ whatever much better."
