I love PatF now, I'd love it then. It would change how I feel about Tangled a bit though, because it would've been in 2D animation then, so I might love it a bit more. (Yes, I'm a biased 3Dist :D)

I like them both. I'm more of a Tangled fan but I have my own theory about Princess and the Frog. I think it would have been the same level of Beauty and the Beast. I think it will get there though.

I think I would love them just the same as I love them now. I think they would have been recieved and appreciated differently by everyone else (the world) if it was in the 90's.

Believe it or not guys there are movies from the 90s that are considered flops
and i kind of agree

Besides let's face it they're basically 90's disney renaissance movies in disguise

I'd probably like them more. I would consider them classics, at least

No, I don't think so.

Only Tangled a tiny bit for the better due to a likely change in animation style.

i love these two movies, i don't care if they're not from the best disney movie's era

I don't think it would change how I feel about PATF much, but I think I would love Tangled a lot more. Because when I think about it, my favourite Disney movies are all ones I grew up with, and those that I've only seen in recent years generally don't make it into my top 10, even if they were produced in the '90s.

There are two ways I can interpret the question.

1) If Tangled, in its current form, were made in thee 90s, I would be even more impressed because it would have been utterly impossible.

or

2) If Tangled were made with possible techniques and technology, I would like it less. There simply would not have been any way to do justice to Rapunzel's hair.