I think the 제목 gives it away a bit, but I quite frankly do not care.
Something I have been noticing lately is the lack of criticism in 코멘트 of art. Usually, everyone will give a generic compliment like awesome and cool, y'know, things that aren't very specific. Gradually, this is pissing me off, and for several reasons as well.
It is not constructive at all:
Listen, I would understand if it was something that is very good where 당신 cannot find any sort of fault, but that's only in Seuris's art. If 당신 genuinely find it to be perfectly executed, then go ahead and give it a generic and positive statement, but if 당신 do not, then 당신 need to give that person your opinion and what they need to work on with their art and how they could do it. That, my children, is called constructive criticism. It is essential to artists to improve on their art. it applies to nearly everything as well. If 당신 think 2 + 2 = 5, 당신 will think that until the end of time unless someone goes up and tells 당신 it's actually 6. Same thing with art.
It is not very interesting to read because of lack of detail:
If 당신 find a specific area 또는 an effect the artist used that 당신 quite enjoy, incorporate that into your opinion and 코멘트 on it. It's plain and quite quotidian to most artists if you're just like dude, liek dis iz ballin'. That's just fucking boring.
It shows you're not sincere with your actual intentions:
Saying something is just kewl shows to the artist 당신 don't really care about the work, even if that's not what 당신 truly feel. Seeming apathetic is a good thing to avoid.
It shows 당신 have a lack of appreciation for better words:
Okay, this is just me being a glossophiliac, but at least using words with 더 많이 syllables and that are used less will make 당신 seem a bit 더 많이 sophisticated and 사무용 겉옷, 전반적인 less of a mainstream moron.
An example I can think of is one shown link. As a artist deemed good 의해 the community, 당신 would think Danni would have something 더 많이 to say other than that. At least maybe something about the over-spacing. My 코멘트 involves my opinion, involving negativity mainly, but better to criticise than generically compliment. Granted, I did not give any advice, but it's mainly due to I have no experience drawing at all digitally, and barely traditionally. Danni, however, has very much experience and could've added a bit more, don't 당신 think?
I do not understand why artists don't help other artists too much with their works. There are some who actually to critique, but most just generically compliment, thinking their actually helping that artist. For example, as a writer, I make sure to point out misspellings, organization and 사무용 겉옷, 전반적인 originality. Basically, If 당신 know they can do better, then tell them. 당신 don't need to give them a paragraph, either. Just a sentence 또는 two could get your point across pretty well and will help them become better artists.
Also: Just because they're drawing and not recolouring, doesn't mean they deserve to not be given constructive criticism on their work. Don't even set recolouring to an unacceptable standard, it doesn't even belong on the scale.
I will conclude with this final message: 다음 time 당신 find some art 당신 see problems with, point it out in a respectable manner and if 당신 can, tell them how they can improve on it. You'll make a community of better artists and 사무용 겉옷, 전반적인 making the community better.
Something I have been noticing lately is the lack of criticism in 코멘트 of art. Usually, everyone will give a generic compliment like awesome and cool, y'know, things that aren't very specific. Gradually, this is pissing me off, and for several reasons as well.
It is not constructive at all:
Listen, I would understand if it was something that is very good where 당신 cannot find any sort of fault, but that's only in Seuris's art. If 당신 genuinely find it to be perfectly executed, then go ahead and give it a generic and positive statement, but if 당신 do not, then 당신 need to give that person your opinion and what they need to work on with their art and how they could do it. That, my children, is called constructive criticism. It is essential to artists to improve on their art. it applies to nearly everything as well. If 당신 think 2 + 2 = 5, 당신 will think that until the end of time unless someone goes up and tells 당신 it's actually 6. Same thing with art.
It is not very interesting to read because of lack of detail:
If 당신 find a specific area 또는 an effect the artist used that 당신 quite enjoy, incorporate that into your opinion and 코멘트 on it. It's plain and quite quotidian to most artists if you're just like dude, liek dis iz ballin'. That's just fucking boring.
It shows you're not sincere with your actual intentions:
Saying something is just kewl shows to the artist 당신 don't really care about the work, even if that's not what 당신 truly feel. Seeming apathetic is a good thing to avoid.
It shows 당신 have a lack of appreciation for better words:
Okay, this is just me being a glossophiliac, but at least using words with 더 많이 syllables and that are used less will make 당신 seem a bit 더 많이 sophisticated and 사무용 겉옷, 전반적인 less of a mainstream moron.
An example I can think of is one shown link. As a artist deemed good 의해 the community, 당신 would think Danni would have something 더 많이 to say other than that. At least maybe something about the over-spacing. My 코멘트 involves my opinion, involving negativity mainly, but better to criticise than generically compliment. Granted, I did not give any advice, but it's mainly due to I have no experience drawing at all digitally, and barely traditionally. Danni, however, has very much experience and could've added a bit more, don't 당신 think?
I do not understand why artists don't help other artists too much with their works. There are some who actually to critique, but most just generically compliment, thinking their actually helping that artist. For example, as a writer, I make sure to point out misspellings, organization and 사무용 겉옷, 전반적인 originality. Basically, If 당신 know they can do better, then tell them. 당신 don't need to give them a paragraph, either. Just a sentence 또는 two could get your point across pretty well and will help them become better artists.
Also: Just because they're drawing and not recolouring, doesn't mean they deserve to not be given constructive criticism on their work. Don't even set recolouring to an unacceptable standard, it doesn't even belong on the scale.
I will conclude with this final message: 다음 time 당신 find some art 당신 see problems with, point it out in a respectable manner and if 당신 can, tell them how they can improve on it. You'll make a community of better artists and 사무용 겉옷, 전반적인 making the community better.
meanwhile at the lab
dr f: u see this is very bad since
brenden: wiat u made a doll of me ad it turned evil
alexa: yes we did u see wen u helped out at the lab (still need to wright that) we wanted to thank u so we dieced to make something to help u we made brenden doll
tober: took me forever to sow
alexa anyways we animated it but it dident happen to go right u see the chip we used ws sadly encripted
dr f: that colud guy seemed relible
lily: wait wait wait did u say colud
dr f: yes his name was could
brenden: where takeing this case
alexa: thank u soo much
dr f: u will need this (hands brendens doll tracker)
derreck: u made a tracker
dr f: in case this kinda thing happend
brenden come on guys lets go
team ok
to be continued
dr f: u see this is very bad since
brenden: wiat u made a doll of me ad it turned evil
alexa: yes we did u see wen u helped out at the lab (still need to wright that) we wanted to thank u so we dieced to make something to help u we made brenden doll
tober: took me forever to sow
alexa anyways we animated it but it dident happen to go right u see the chip we used ws sadly encripted
dr f: that colud guy seemed relible
lily: wait wait wait did u say colud
dr f: yes his name was could
brenden: where takeing this case
alexa: thank u soo much
dr f: u will need this (hands brendens doll tracker)
derreck: u made a tracker
dr f: in case this kinda thing happend
brenden come on guys lets go
team ok
to be continued
Name: Moka Purre'
Species: Cat (persian)
Age: 17
Nickname: Cool Cat
Color: Dark purple and magenta
She mainly believes in beauty, charm, looks, and attraction. I guess 당신 could say she is conceited. But that doesn't change the way she is very caring and acts as Kami's guardian. Very responsible.
Name: Kami
Species: Rabbit
Age:14
Nickname: Bipolar Bunny
Color: Cream and light yellow
Strange and highly annoying, mainly because shes bipolar. Her idol is Moka and she is obsessed with Vlad. Has no parents.
Name: Winter Bride
Species: Not sure XD
Age: Not sure
Nickname: Woman in the mist
Color: Creamy misty color
Her beauty and wealth is admired 의해 all. Not much is known behind her.
Name: Koko
Species: Cat (Maine Coon)
Age: 15
Nickname: Choco cat
Color: 초콜릿 brown
Adopted and not very social. She can be timid but uses her powers as her main weapons.
Species: Cat (persian)
Age: 17
Nickname: Cool Cat
Color: Dark purple and magenta
She mainly believes in beauty, charm, looks, and attraction. I guess 당신 could say she is conceited. But that doesn't change the way she is very caring and acts as Kami's guardian. Very responsible.
Name: Kami
Species: Rabbit
Age:14
Nickname: Bipolar Bunny
Color: Cream and light yellow
Strange and highly annoying, mainly because shes bipolar. Her idol is Moka and she is obsessed with Vlad. Has no parents.
Name: Winter Bride
Species: Not sure XD
Age: Not sure
Nickname: Woman in the mist
Color: Creamy misty color
Her beauty and wealth is admired 의해 all. Not much is known behind her.
Name: Koko
Species: Cat (Maine Coon)
Age: 15
Nickname: Choco cat
Color: 초콜릿 brown
Adopted and not very social. She can be timid but uses her powers as her main weapons.
Name: slicer
Race: wolf
Sex: male
Age: 20
Aligment: hero
Powers: aura, and speed
speed: with sword 400-700mhp, with out sword 700-1000mhp.
fighting style: he fights with a 900lb sword with a combo of speed and aura.
Attack and special:
Signature: aura force, aura blast, aura exploshin
aura cool down time 1 to 3 hours
Specials: aura sences, aura boost, aura sheal, healing aura, and his hiden power call chaos summons it use three chaos emeralds to let slicer go super and only works when he is in danger
Commend attacks: spin blade, speed blade, dash blade, homeing blade, aura spin dash, aura dash punch, aura slash, speed punch, speed kick, speed slash, claw 슬래쉬 and combo attacks
Chaos power:
3 emerald-super form
7 emerald-chaos form (note this is his hyper form)
7 emeralds+master emerald-nova form (note this is a new form that goes beyone the hyper form)
Race: wolf
Sex: male
Age: 20
Aligment: hero
Powers: aura, and speed
speed: with sword 400-700mhp, with out sword 700-1000mhp.
fighting style: he fights with a 900lb sword with a combo of speed and aura.
Attack and special:
Signature: aura force, aura blast, aura exploshin
aura cool down time 1 to 3 hours
Specials: aura sences, aura boost, aura sheal, healing aura, and his hiden power call chaos summons it use three chaos emeralds to let slicer go super and only works when he is in danger
Commend attacks: spin blade, speed blade, dash blade, homeing blade, aura spin dash, aura dash punch, aura slash, speed punch, speed kick, speed slash, claw 슬래쉬 and combo attacks
Chaos power:
3 emerald-super form
7 emerald-chaos form (note this is his hyper form)
7 emeralds+master emerald-nova form (note this is a new form that goes beyone the hyper form)