It depends, really.
We don't know if she'd still do herself up the same way if she wasn't famous.

Famous or not. she is NOT attractive, for me.

Being famous has nothing to do with you physical appearance (other than you have the money to have plastic surgery lol) and people are usually harsh on judging the looks of celebrities. I mean, I've seen people who say that people who are quite plain or average looking to be gorgeous because they're people in real life that they know. However, when it comes to celebrities, they judge them REALLY HARSH! I mean, I met one person who said that Miley looked like a deformed hamster (any hamster that looks like a human is deformed). Miley is gorgeous whether she's famous or not, whether she has long hair or short, whether she acts classy or not. She's always been physically beautiful but what I love about her is her beautiful heart and how she loves to break the mold of what's considered to be physically beautiful. I mean, she was once voted the most beautiful woman alive in Maxim magazine when she first got her short hair and even said her hair was shorter than most of her guy friends. She does what makes her happy, what makes her feel beautiful, is letting people know that their own unique style is something they should embrace, and refuses to fit the typical mold.

I thought she was attractive with her old look. Definitely not now. Maybe I'd still like her even if she wasn't famous but as of right now I really dislike her new looks and therefore that equals not attractive TO me. I have others I have my eye on.

Yes and no. Agree with BlindBandit92. She was so much better in Hannah Montana with her long brown hair. She looked really pretty back them.

Never really found her pretty or ugly really. But I agree with Lee here.

No I don't think she's pretty.

I mean I don't think she's ugly by any means, she's more average to me; and would be that way famous or not.

I always thought that she is average looking