What's the dumbest argument 당신 have ever heard?

 Hakros323 posted over a year ago
next question »

랜덤 답변

BlindBandit92 said:
People arguing on which religion is better 또는 worldview is better. Conceptually it's fine to discuss worldviews but people always get in heated arguments over it and want to have the most superior worldview and it simply becomes elitist.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Kragfan1910 said:
Oh god, where do I start?

Without government, who would build the roads? Probably something like that.

A $15 minimum wage would be good for the economy because minimum wage workers would make more, and would therefore spend more.
Yeah, that one is pretty dumb too.

No, no, I have it!
See picture below.
It's dumb for two reasons, and is has to do with the definition of an assault rifle.
An assault 소총 is any select 불, 화재 weapon that is chambered for a medium sized cartridge. Examples include: M-16, select fire AK-47s, and the STG-44, chambered for 5.56NATO, 7.62x39, and 8mm kurtz. These cartridges produce about 1,300-1,500 foot pounds of energy. It's worth noting none of these cartridges are recommended for elk, and will have a very hard time killing an 코끼리 또는 a bird. Some people do hunt with medium sized cartridges in non assault rifles (such as ar-15s, 또는 rugar mini-14s, but they hunt 수퇘지, 멧돼지 또는 small deer.)
Now, normal hunting cartridges would include, 30-06, 8mm mauser, 또는 30-30, which will produce somewhere around three times the energy of an assault rifle's cartridge.
Another problem with the comic is how, even in the United States, the 능보, 요새 of gun rights, true assault rifles are regulated. Select 불, 화재 weapons are categorized as machine 총 의해 the ATF under the NFA. 당신 have to have an ATF trust, tons of paperwork, and withstand a long waiting period in order to get an assault rifle. It's difficult to do, and no hunter who isn't also a massive and comparatively wealthy gun enthusiast, will not have access to one.

select as best answer
 Oh god, where do I start? Without government, who would build the roads? Probably something like that. A $15 minimum wage would be good for the economy because minimum wage workers would make more, and would therefore spend more. Yeah, that one is pretty dumb too. No, no, I have it! See picture below. It's dumb for two reasons, and is has to do with the definition of an assault rifle. An assault 소총 is any select 불, 화재 weapon that is chambered for a medium sized cartridge. Examples include: M-16, [i]select fire[/i] AK-47s, and the STG-44, chambered for 5.56NATO, 7.62x39, and 8mm kurtz. These cartridges produce about 1,300-1,500 foot pounds of energy. It's worth noting none of these cartridges are recommended for elk, and will have a very hard time killing an 코끼리 또는 a bird. Some people do hunt with medium sized cartridges in non assault rifles (such as ar-15s, 또는 rugar mini-14s, but they hunt 수퇘지, 멧돼지 또는 small deer.) Now, normal hunting cartridges would include, 30-06, 8mm mauser, 또는 30-30, which will produce somewhere around three times the energy of an assault rifle's cartridge. Another problem with the comic is how, even in the United States, the 능보, 요새 of gun rights, true assault rifles [i]are[/i] regulated. Select 불, 화재 weapons are categorized as machine 총 의해 the ATF under the NFA. 당신 have to have an ATF trust, tons of paperwork, and withstand a long waiting period in order to get an assault rifle. It's difficult to do, and no hunter who isn't also a massive and comparatively wealthy gun enthusiast, will not have access to one.
posted over a year ago 
*
I smell a Trump supporter....
FlightofFantasy posted over a year ago
*
^Kragfan is the furthest thing from a Trump supporter. I'm not even sure how 당신 could reasonably come to such a conclusion 의해 this post alone, as very little of it has anything to do with Trump's platform. Unless, of course, 당신 were commenting with a judgement already on your mind about people who don't support big government. No, Kragfan is not a Donald Trump Supporter. Kragfan is a libertarian. And just because they hold a 더 많이 economically conservative viewpoint than 당신 does not automatically make them a supporter of a facist, Hitler clone.
8theGreat posted over a year ago
*
LOL sorry. "Fiscal conservative" as in 'conservative' with money. Probs not the right description, 'conservative' has lots of political baggage. Labels are hard to get correct, orright xD
ThePrincesTale posted over a year ago
AquaMarine6663 said:
Who would win: 슈퍼맨 또는 Thor?
On my bus, this argument went on for days, even though the answer is obvious. :3
select as best answer
 Who would win: 슈퍼맨 또는 Thor? On my bus, this argument went on for days, even though the answer is obvious. :3
posted over a year ago 
*
Actually, I saw the YouTube video. I wish Thor had won, but 슈퍼맨 win
Willowfrost posted over a year ago
*
^ 당신 mean the Rap battles?
a11-swift posted over a year ago
8theGreat said:
Just about everything regarding third wave feminism, both for and against it.
It's like people just kinda lose their shit and the whole "debate" becomes super ad hominem and the whole thing becomes really dumb really quick.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
How did 당신 answer this 질문 twice ? O_O
Stalag posted over a year ago
*
^I'm capable of doing so because I'm the member of a godlike species that can do whatever we want.
8theGreat posted over a year ago
8theGreat said:
Oh, also whether 또는 not boobs 또는 butts are better. Genuine "argument" I've had once.
I'm team boob.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
Team boob represent!
Kragfan1910 posted over a year ago
*
^
Riku114 posted over a year ago
*
Well fine! ~_~
zombie_lover posted over a year ago
BlindBandit92 said:
Another dumb argument would be using illogical reasons to defend 또는 not defend a characters,people,places,etc. People always go complete fanboy/fangirl and alot of times they don't try to reason with anyone 또는 make anything they say feasible in the slightest.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Sunflame said:
There was an argument in my class whether DC 또는 Marvel is better.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
MaxandMart said:
People voting for a party even though they do not support the party's platform. They hope that if the party gets in that they do not actually go through with any of their promises.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
I understand.
Kragfan1910 posted over a year ago
zombie_lover said:
The dumbest argument? lets see here its on the news every time there's some wack that dose a mass shooting.

People kill people, says one news reporter. I agree lets take away 총 because they kill people the 초 reporter says to the first.

총 don't kill people. people kill people. If some guy go's nuts and drives a school bus thew a church and that kills people are we going to outlaw the school bus? Of course not because then and only then it the persons fault not the item used to do it.

It's a dumb argument because it gets people riled up and for what reason? We all have opinions so were always going to argue.

select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
I always say, there is no reason for gun laws except to pacify those who buy into the left's political lies.
Kragfan1910 posted over a year ago
Nick3600 said:
if kim k 또는 kylie k is better

thats like asking which is worse, aids 또는 cancer
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Wolfpaw6 said:
I overheard my brother and his friend yelling

"I WANNA KILL THAT BAD GUY" "NO I AM GOING TO KILL HIM!" and it went on and on
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
next question »