Do 당신 believe in animal rights?

Explain.

I believe we should respect animals, but we DO need them for testing and 음식 so....
*
no, we don't really need them for testing. It's evil! The poor creatures don't even know(or want) what's going on! We do need something to test stuff on but I really wish they would use something like cloned people, not 동물
swiddlewiddle posted over a year ago
 Ninjacupcake posted over a year ago
next question »

랜덤 답변

NomyCake said:
I don't think 동물 should be abused.
I think slaughter houses should be 더 많이 humane.
동물 have rights, too. They aren't human, but they are people.


I don't disagree with eating them, though. I'm a carnivore. If it isn't meat, I probably won't eat it. But that doesn't mean I think 동물 are any less than us. I always say "Thank you" before I eat. Not to God, not to whoever cooked and served me the food, but I thank the animal for giving its life away to keep other people alive. It's part of survival. If we lived in the wild like we were supposed to, we would have to eat them to survive. And we have to eat them to survive in our society as well. That's the way it's supposed to be, and that's what keeps things balanced.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
agreed
BlindBandit92 posted over a year ago
thespikedturtle said:
I'm a total animal rights activist, animal lover, and vegetarian.

We don't NEED them for food, 또는 testing. People are generally just too stubborn to change their diet, and big companies don't want to risk getting sued.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
Okay :) I was asking because the 토론 topic for NFL is justice requires the recognition of animal rights.
Ninjacupcake posted over a year ago
*
당신 don't think it's bad to raise 동물 just for their food? They never get to actually be animals, they're raised in cages in most places. And before they even become full adults, they get killed. That seems fair to you? That's pretty much no different than a 강아지 mill, and nobody likes those.
thespikedturtle posted over a year ago
*
Heh, human trails... I agree, criminals are a much better test subject. 또는 what about suicidal people who don't have a reason to live anymore? They might as well be useful, and they might even change their minds after a few tests. I know there's not a really better option, but we can't rely on 동물 forever, it's not fair to them.
thespikedturtle posted over a year ago
someone_save_me said:
YESS. But I'm not like PETA-level crazy.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
Yeah, me too.
Ninjacupcake posted over a year ago
*
Agreed. I was going to say the same thing.
BlindBandit92 posted over a year ago
BlindBandit92 said:
I believe in animal rights. But I'm not crazy. There are some things that we need 동물 for. 동물 have feelings just like humans but PETA goes too in trying to convey their ideas to people.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
coriann said:
yes. people definitely need to be 더 많이 humane to 동물 :)
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
oh and i think they should stop putting 개 to sleep
coriann posted over a year ago
swiddlewiddle said:
Duhh! 동물 are so cute and innocent, we need to protect them from other people 또는 natural disasters!
I try to buy only products that say they weren't tested on animals(they have a little bunny sign on them). It's really cruel to experiment cosmetics on animals! The cure for cancer... maybe! But not freakin' make up!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
snowwhitesilver said:
This is a hard one. We do need to test things out, but I feel like we don't deserve this planet as much as 동물 do. They live to survive, and we just fuck things up, and it's not about the entire world for us. I think they derserve it more, not that I want to disappear....but, that's that human arrogance. 동물 don't have that. they just live!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
GoldnSnitch_96 said:
Of course!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
r-pattz said:
To an extent.

I believe in animal testing for drugs and other science. If we didn't test our meds on animals, millions of people who could have been saved would die. But the moment we get sufficient technology to allow us to test drugs on machines, not animals, then switch. But for now, animal testing is necessary.

I do, however, think the 동물 should be treated 더 많이 humanely. They should be kept in better cages, given sedatives when needed, etc. This goes for things like 강아지 mills and pet stores, too. 강아지 mills should be shut down, because the 개 need to be kept in much better conditions. That's why I'm against buying 개 from pet stores - they all come from these shitty 강아지 mills.

I'm alright with eating animals, keeping them in zoos to study and breed them, owning them as pets, all that. Animal abuse though, is wrong. But that stuff isn't abuse.

select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
당신 do know that after it's tested on animals, it's tested on humans, right? We're too different not to.
thespikedturtle posted over a year ago
*
^ Yes, but only after it passes animal trials. My point holds.
r-pattz posted over a year ago
*
I actually agree with you.
Brandey posted over a year ago
80s-Gal said:
Yes, I do believe in animal rights. 동물 have feelings just like people. They may not be able to articulate what they want most of the time, but they should have rights. They should NOT be tested on, EVER. Animal testing is inhumane and should be punishable 의해 law.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Seastar4374 said:
Hell to the fucking yes! I live across the 거리 from a pet store and down the road from an animal hospital. I see a lot of abused 동물 또는 starved 동물 in my neighborhood and I am sick of it. My dog 복숭아 is one of the only healthy 동물 in the entire neighborhood. I mean there's only like 2 other healthy 개 then all the 고양이 except for a select few have never even seen shelter 또는 the clinic. I feel seariously bad for them but what am I to do? I can't help all of them 의해 myself. And I have tried calling local shelters and stuff like that. Biggest waste of time in my life. They didn't even care. Not once have they ever come out to try and help. Me and my neighbors from the pet store are the only ones helping them and they have to manage helping customers also.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
darkwave said:
yes,always!!!
Animal´s have feelings too...
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
totally
Brandey posted over a year ago
zanhar1 said:
Yes I do
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Jeffersonian said:
Lets just say I like 동물 but if a member of my family becomes a dedicated PETA activist I will disown them and make their life hell. (meaning I approve of hunting, farming and eating meat, testing probably not unless it's an animal product.)
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
dreamfields said:
I believe that people should always look for the kindest way to treat animals. If they are pets, I think they should be bred in a healthy way and not massed produced in 강아지 mills. They should also be well fed and not mistreated.
When they are raised for food, I think when the time comes for them to die, it should be as quick and painless as possible.
Using 동물 to conduct testing for cosmetics seems to me as frivilous and unnessary. I do agree with the humane use of scientific testing to find new medications. Where would modern medicine be without such testing?
In the end, 동물 are here for the sake of man. Also mankind has the responsibilty to watch over them. But 동물 do not have human rights. People have the responsibility act to be humainly.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
next question »