This is 더 많이 of a rant than a well-thought out article, but since this here is called "soap-box", I am going to use it.


I'm currently 글쓰기 my paper for my Human Rights class. Sometimes I come upon 기사 that are so messed up...

I can understand 기사 that argue for example for economic interests against human rights. I do not agree with those, but at least they have often an argumentation that makes sense.

But the 기사 I just read... it was actually published in a booklet 의해 Amnesty International. I have no idea why they put that in there. Maybe to show how ridiculous some argumentations...

I’ve been thinking about human rights in art and literature. Two specific things come to mind. In my English class, we read Melville’s Billy Budd, a Christian allegory about impressed sailors. In my anthropology human rights class, we talked about “the Rights of Man,” 의해 Thomas Paine and my mind drifted to the name of Billy’s original ship, the Rights-of-Man (abbreviated to “Rights.”) It was an obvious allusion to Thomas Paine. It was incredibly blatant symbolism that Billy was impressed onto a ship called the Indomitable. Impressment is just one of the times in history in which...