I'm not really sure... I mean, I know she's a Princess but every time I upload a picture of Kiara i don't write "Princess Kiara" like I would if I uploaded a picture of Ariel... It's the same with Simba and Bambi... Even though I know they're Princes I don't write "Walt Disney Screencaps - Prince Simba" or "Prince Bambi".

I mean like Disney don't count her as a princess or have her on the list of princesses (like Mulan, Ariel, etc) all because she's an animal despite her being the daughter of a king and queen, I'm not meaning do you call her a princess I'm trying to ask would you consider her as a princess despite Disney's rules.

I mean, not an official DP, but she's as much a princess as Kida and Giselle are.

^What NCISLuverjk93 said.

What they need to do is come up with a disney princess line devoted to animals!

And same for the disney prince animals!

In a tongue-in-cheek way. I even consider Nala to be a Disney Princess sometimes (because she was at least betrothed to a prince). I accept the animal characters aren't on the official list and all, but it's fun to think about anyway!

Yeah, she is still daughter of king and queen. Human or not, she is a princess.

Of course yes. After all, Kiara is a princess by birth.