I’m not here to argue the entire moral spectrum of Nudity, but I am going to make a statement about what kind of nude pictures are tolerable, 또는 can be tolerable. The following is a list of completely nude female characters that do not require censorship because, while they are nude, they do not reveal private body parts.
link
link
link
link
Now I don’t know about everyone but I don’t remember being told 의해 someone that the nude pictures I’ve drawn of my characters were sexual. Never once have I been told to remove them either. In the same way, characters like Sally Acorn, and Barby Koala, who don’t cover, aren’t revealing either.
That’s one of the great things about mobian characters. They don’t need covering because it doesn’t show unless the plot demands it (*coughrougeli’endacough*), and never has it been shown when nude, but actually when clothed. And even then, when clothed there was no penis, anus, 또는 nipple, in sight.
Are two circles between the chest, 또는 a line between the legs and rear, really mandatory to draw a perfect beautiful picture? I certainly don’t think so. Clothing 또는 not, it adds very little to someone who wants to make something “beautiful” and a great deal to people who aren’t going to appreciate such revealing imagery.
Now in the event that I am told my pictures are too sexual, I can completely understand why someone would think that, and even if I feel that they aren’t, I know that my character doesn’t need to be nude to have its full potential. To me, it’s 더 많이 important that I consider the mental purity of another person, rather than going with what I want.
Clothing isn’t the enemy, and 당신 can be just as creative and flamboyant and beautiful 의해 using clothing, as 당신 can with the body itself. I like to combine the two when I can.
Basically what I am saying here is that 당신 can still draw the bodily shape, but 당신 do not have to draw the body parts no one should see. Shaped breasts, rear, rear-cracks, privates, nipples, these are not mandatory.
Take that as 당신 will. This isn’t a challenge, this is an explanation and an outreach for resolution.
Thank 당신 and God Bless
link
link
link
link
Now I don’t know about everyone but I don’t remember being told 의해 someone that the nude pictures I’ve drawn of my characters were sexual. Never once have I been told to remove them either. In the same way, characters like Sally Acorn, and Barby Koala, who don’t cover, aren’t revealing either.
That’s one of the great things about mobian characters. They don’t need covering because it doesn’t show unless the plot demands it (*coughrougeli’endacough*), and never has it been shown when nude, but actually when clothed. And even then, when clothed there was no penis, anus, 또는 nipple, in sight.
Are two circles between the chest, 또는 a line between the legs and rear, really mandatory to draw a perfect beautiful picture? I certainly don’t think so. Clothing 또는 not, it adds very little to someone who wants to make something “beautiful” and a great deal to people who aren’t going to appreciate such revealing imagery.
Now in the event that I am told my pictures are too sexual, I can completely understand why someone would think that, and even if I feel that they aren’t, I know that my character doesn’t need to be nude to have its full potential. To me, it’s 더 많이 important that I consider the mental purity of another person, rather than going with what I want.
Clothing isn’t the enemy, and 당신 can be just as creative and flamboyant and beautiful 의해 using clothing, as 당신 can with the body itself. I like to combine the two when I can.
Basically what I am saying here is that 당신 can still draw the bodily shape, but 당신 do not have to draw the body parts no one should see. Shaped breasts, rear, rear-cracks, privates, nipples, these are not mandatory.
Take that as 당신 will. This isn’t a challenge, this is an explanation and an outreach for resolution.
Thank 당신 and God Bless
Don't ask in the comments. There's a place. This ones really short sorry. Okay, silver's the host. Ashton and shadow bicker a lot so if it's annoying 당신 코멘트 so I can beat the snout out of them. Let's go.
......................................................................................................
Silver: From AmeliaRose2002
To shadow, if Amy was your girlfriend would 당신 call her stupid?
Shadow: that's hard. I do like amy a little be she's annoying so probably
Ashton: then her piko piko hammer hits you.
Silver: should I say I agree with Ashton 또는 am I going to get hit.
Both: shut up, silver.
Silver: From AmeliaRose2002
To Ashton, why do 당신 have an axe?
Ashton: why? We'll long story short, I needed it to hit Shadsy with when he's bad.
Shadow: when am I ever bad?
Ashton: lots of times.
Silver:*laughing*
Ashton:*hits him with her axe's blunt end*
Silver:*holding head* ow!
Shadow: bye
Ashton: 늑대 girl out
Silver : bye bye
......................................................................................................
Silver: From AmeliaRose2002
To shadow, if Amy was your girlfriend would 당신 call her stupid?
Shadow: that's hard. I do like amy a little be she's annoying so probably
Ashton: then her piko piko hammer hits you.
Silver: should I say I agree with Ashton 또는 am I going to get hit.
Both: shut up, silver.
Silver: From AmeliaRose2002
To Ashton, why do 당신 have an axe?
Ashton: why? We'll long story short, I needed it to hit Shadsy with when he's bad.
Shadow: when am I ever bad?
Ashton: lots of times.
Silver:*laughing*
Ashton:*hits him with her axe's blunt end*
Silver:*holding head* ow!
Shadow: bye
Ashton: 늑대 girl out
Silver : bye bye