Is horror 더 많이 likely to appeal to male readers, e.g. men like violence while women do not? Why?

I am a female and I actively seek out horror. I write it too. link
Horror is my absolute 가장 좋아하는 genre of book and movie. I almost exclusively watch horror 영화 in theaters.

In other words, no I don't think it's 더 많이 likely to appeal to men. I know so many women who enjoy horror very much. One of the biggest horror 팬 I know is female. And I also know a guy who is squeamish about horror movies. Gender doesn't dictate interests.
I feel like society tries to push certain interests on boys and girls. But I also feel like that's happening less and less.

I also think that violence doesn't have anything to do with it. I don't seek out horror 영화 because I crave violence. I seek it out because I crave a thrill. Something to give me a rush without actually putting myself in danger.
And when I do seek out horror 영화 to see people die it's usually because I'm in a bad mood and it's much healthier to watch fictional people suffer than go out and make real people suffer.
I feel like violence/horror 영화 have a certain draw because it's almost fascinating to see what a person can go through and withstand. It harmlessly quenches a curiosity.

What the fuck.

Man, when I saw this question, my first thought was - Is that Mike guy back with another acc? :S

I don't think it matters, if 당신 like violence than 당신 like violence..

I think it's actually the other way around. Also, horror doesn't have to be violent.

I don't think it only applies to men. Like Zanhar1 said 'Gender doesn't dictate interests'. It really depends on the person. I myself am Female and I 사랑 horror and violence. I 사랑 to watch it just as much as I 사랑 to read it.I like to get scared and grossed out. I also know pleanty of other females who 사랑 horror.

ɪᴛ’s ᴍᴏsᴛʟʏ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇ ғᴇᴍɪɴɪɴɪᴛʏ ᴏғ ғᴇᴍᴀʟᴇs. ᴀʟᴛʜᴏᴜɢʜ ғᴇᴍᴀʟᴇs ᴜsᴜᴀʟʟʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ғᴇᴍɪɴɪɴᴇ ᴛʀᴀɪᴛs ɪɴ ᴍᴏsᴛ ᴄᴀsᴇs, ᴛʜɪs ɪs ᴀ ғᴏʀᴍ ᴏғ ɢᴇɴᴇʀᴀʟɪsᴀᴛɪᴏɴ, ᴀɴᴅ ᴍᴀʟᴇs ᴄᴀɴ ᴄᴏɴsᴛɪᴛᴜᴛᴇ ғᴇᴍɪɴɪɴᴇ ᴛʀᴀɪᴛs ᴀs ᴡᴇʟʟ. ʙᴜᴛ, ғʀᴏᴍ ɢᴇɴᴇʀᴀʟ ᴘᴇʀsᴘᴇᴄᴛɪᴠᴇ, ғᴇᴍᴀʟᴇs ᴀʀᴇ ʟᴇss ʟɪᴋᴇʟʏ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴀᴛᴛʀᴀᴄᴛᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ᴠɪᴏʟᴇɴᴄᴇ ᴅᴜᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴀᴛ. ʜᴏᴡᴇᴠᴇʀ, ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʀᴀɪᴛs ᴏғ ғᴇᴍɪɴɪɴɪᴛʏ ʟᴀᴄᴋs sᴘᴇᴄɪғɪᴄɪᴛʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴠᴀʀɪᴇs ғʀᴏᴍ ᴄᴜʟᴛᴜʀᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴄᴜʟᴛᴜʀᴇ, ᴘʟᴀᴄᴇs ᴀɴᴅ ᴇɴᴠɪʀᴏɴᴍᴇɴᴛs. So, it's not quite clear and the conclusion is vague. All we can do is generalise at best.