Why is there a life ?

Just study the lives of a few animals. They have far less choice than humans do. EDIT: There are no proper scientific *theories* for the origin of life - but there are several hypotheses (the difference being that an hypothesis has not been as rigorously tested, and is not as widely-accepted as a theory).
The origin of life is called "abiogenesis", and there are several possible hypotheses. Probably the best-accepted onecurrently is the"RNA world" hypothesis.
This hypothesis notes that while DNA is an excellent information-storage system for the genome, and proteins are structural and catalytic, RNA can do *both*. It can act as information-storage (for example in the genomes of RNA viruses), and it can be structural (e.g. - the ribosome) and catalytic ("ribozymes": RNA-based enzymes).
The theory goes that the conditions in pre-life earth were amenable for the abiotic synthesis of organic molecules such as polysaccharides, polynucleotides, polypeptides, and lipids (this has been borne-out 의해 work like the famous Miller-Urey experiment).Some of these chemically-synthesised molecules will have included short oligonucleotides of RNA with 랜덤 sequences. Some of these sequences will have been capable of "autocatalysis" - making copies of themselves (as DNA can do), and obviously this willhave led to 더 많이 and 더 많이 of this type of RNA oligonucleotide existing. RNA autocatalysis is notoriously error-prone, so mutations will have been abundant: some of these mutations will have led to dead-ends, wherethe molecule could no longer autocatalyse, but others will have improved efficiency. Yet other mutations could lead to the RNA being able to associate with other molecules, like short oligopeptides. This association would sometimes have led to an advantageous behaviour - like increased stability for either 또는 both partners, improved autocatalysis, 또는 even the ability to catalyse the*formation* of oligopeptides on the RNA.
And there 당신 have the beginnings of"life", with the genome-protein relationship, and natural selection (with the most stable and best at autocatalysis becoming 더 많이 predominant).
The wikipedia 기사 on abiogenesis gives a 더 많이 detailed 설명 of the various hypotheses.

There is life because of one person: God

And to Prophet: Dude, animals? NO! 동물 have rights like we do, so don't act like they don't. I 사랑 animals.

Tons of asteroids over the course of billions of years crashed into Earth bringing water and bacterial life which over 더 많이 billions of years slowly evolved into life we know today.
That's the most accepted scientific explanation but choose to believe in whatever 당신 wish~

I could go really in depth on this, but that will probably start arguments.

So basically there is life because everything about earth's atmosphere is perfect to sustain life. There is saying "life always finds a way" and that can be applied to why there is life, in science if there is the perfect sitiuation for something to happen, it will most likely happen

God I 사랑 science

Life is on earth so people could have a choice to follow their own path, God 또는 Saten. If 당신 are not following God 당신 are following Saten, there's nothing in between.

That is what I belive, I don't care what other people belive, 당신 can belive what ever 당신 want.