3
added by LiveLoveMusic
This Paul McCartney 사진 contains 신사복, 비즈니스 정장, 옷 한 벌, 한 벌, 옷, 양복, and 정장. There might also be 세 벌의 양복, 3 피스 슈트, 3 개 조각 한 벌, 드레스 정장, 전체 드레스, 연미복, 테일 코트, 꼬리, 흰색 넥타이, 흰색 넥타이와 꼬리, 드레스 복, 정장, 꼬리 코트, 흰 넥타이, 흰 넥타이 및 꼬리, 드레스 한 벌, 풀 드레스, tailcoat, 화이트 타이, 화이트 넥타이 꼬리, 여유 소송, 한산한 옷, and 느슨하게 옷.
Alright I just went through the Rolling Stone's list of the 100 Greatest artists of all time and Paul wasn't in there. That is appalling. Statistically he should be in the 상단, 맨 위로 five. It is an outrage. Why would Rolling Stone do something like that. John Lennon made it and he only did a few albums. My theory is that the panel Rolling Stone assembled to make the list is incompetent, which is shown 의해 that mistake as well as many numerous other wrong and weird rankings. Also, I have heard that Rolling Stone magazine never really liked Paul McCartney and never took his 음악 history, but still he should have been on that list.
