이 질문에 답하기

해리 포터 질문

Who else is angry at the fact that they left out...*spoilers for those who haven't read the seventh book 또는 who haven't seen the 6th film'??

Who is really angry that they left out Dumbledore's funeral in the film?? The book was fantastic, but without it in the film, it was almost as if it wasn't complete. I think that they should have added in the scene, as a tribute to a great wizard.
*
I don't really care because the entire film was crap. Most of whatever little acrion was in the book, was left out and what was left in was portrayed so half-heartedly even 의해 the usually great actors. And there wasn't even nearly enough Voldemort's past stuff rhough it was pretty much the whole point of the book.
bendaimmortal posted over a year ago
*
exactly the film was nuthin compared to the book
DiNozzosShorty posted over a year ago
*
I hated it and JKR even said she didn't like it.
LoveforSeverus posted over a year ago
*
the movie sux. we want tonks. most of us.
sickla posted over a year ago
 Aimee147 posted over a year ago
next question »

해리 포터 답변

bri-marie said:
To be honest, I haven't cared for the 영화 much since Yates started directing. PoA was ok, GoF was ehhh, OotP was horrible and HBP was worse than that.

This movie in general made me angry, but adding the burrow scene, which did nothing to the plot (if the Death Eaters could chase Harry around a 옥수수 field and then set his 집 on fire, why couldn't they have kidnapped him and taken him to Voldemort????) and leaving out the last fight scene, screwing up the last scene between Harry and Snape, and leaving out Dumbledore's funeral were the biggest mistakes Yates made.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
christie_skouta said:
I totally agree. They filmed the attack to the Burrow which isn't in the 책 and they left out Dumbledore's funeral. Do 당신 think that they might show it movie 7?
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
i hope so.
1-2vampire posted over a year ago
*
When Bellatrix and Fenrir burned down the Burrow it kinda ruined the wedding scene in the last book.
AthenaChristina posted over a year ago
*
Unless the Weasley's somehow rebuild the house wuth magic.... wouldn't surprise me for the film makers to do that
disneygirl11 posted over a year ago
*
Thank you! I was like "they wasted all the time on the Burrow burning down, which they need later, but no Dumby funeral, which they also need. But one is utter BS and the other isn't."
LoveforSeverus posted over a year ago
topazEYEs91 said:
yea i thought that was whack the burning of the borrow wasnt even in the book the should have put in dumbledores funeral instead of the borrow burning even tho i liked that scene, because of bellatrix, but it still shouldnt have been in the movie...
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
yes it should have! That was my 가장 좋아하는 part!
LadyL68 posted over a year ago
*
like i said i liked the scene but i think they should have contributed 더 많이 to dumbledore..
topazEYEs91 posted over a year ago
*
okay going back to the burrow, they burn it down but they need ti for the 7th movie because of the wedding
stevie_fan98 posted over a year ago
PinkVsBlue said:
I was. It should have been included. Plus its an important scene in the book.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
ScottishChic said:
I totally agree.

I came out of the cinema 더 많이 than disappointed!
I couldn't believe they left that out, it was a major part of the 6th book and a very emotional part too. I know they had a lot to fit on but I mean, come on! That would have been a fantastic scene to watch.

I thought they would have shown a little respect to Dumbledore, after everything he did for everyone.

Do 당신 think it could be in the deleted scenes, in the DVD's?? I know it would be a long deleted scene but it would be worth it, right??
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Elizabeth_Darcy said:
I think they should have added that scene, too.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Neytiri1045 said:
I totally agree. I was so mad! It was like "O_o WTF??".
I think that in the movie they did not make Dumbledore's death stroug enough, I cryed a lot in the book but not in the movie!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
reneemonique said:
i know! they totally should have put that in.
the film was a bit odd though cause it kept moving to different scenes over and over again. they left loads over other things out that i liked in the book like the dursleys,theres no grawp and nothing on the Peverell family. but it was still good:)

select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
lilith84 said:
a little, yeah.... there were so many scenes that SHOULD have been in the movie, the funeral, the DADA lessons, the Death Eater vs OOTP fight... The movie was a big dissapointment and only slightly better than the 이전 one.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
*fifth
1-2vampire posted over a year ago
*
ino the fitch one was absolute dribble.
1-2vampire posted over a year ago
stevie_fan98 said:
they didnt have it but at least they had a small tribute.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Beatlesxoxo said:
I had heard a long time 이전 they were thinking about adding it in the begining of the 7th because they felt it didn't "fit well" at the ending of the 6th movie 또는 something like that. I don't know though because I remember I heard it a long time ago. I don't see how they could seeing as Deathly Hallows is a great book packed with tons of important details and will still be long even with the 스플릿, 분할 of two movies.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
KishuandIchigo said:
I saw the 5th movie, and it was really bad (They left out all of the good parts!!!1!) And I tried to watch the 6th movie (before I read the book) and I dodn't understand any of it. But I *tried* to watch the end anyways. And I think they should have added the funeral, but I don't really care, because I don't even want to see the rest of the movie.


And if they leave out anything in DH (which I will finish soon) I will DIE.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
they should have added peeves in the 5th movie
Fairy8346 posted over a year ago
venvargie said:
I was 더 많이 pissed off at the Burrow scene than anything.

WHAT THE FUCKING SHIT.

I know 영화 aren't /exactly/ like the 책 and they tend to add stuff but REALLY!?

Judging 의해 the looks on their faces, their house was destroyed completely which is, like, totally bullshit for one.

HELLO, WHAT ABOUT BILL AND FLUER'S WEDDING!?

God this scene pissed me off SO much I had to stop myself from taking the dvd outta my PS2 and snapping it in half!!!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Fairy8346 said:
they leave out all the best parts
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
brookelet6 said:
I agree, how could they leave out Dumbledore's funeral? That was probably the biggest part of the book they left out, but they didn't introduce Bill 또는 Rufus Scrimgeour yet and Scrimgeour had always been trying to convince Harry to be the poster boy.... Those were some pretty good parts. Especially when Harry tells him off. Another part that they've left out, were all those scenes when Harry and Ginny were dating. The only hint they gave that was Ginny 키싱 Harry in the Room of Requirement. Even though they left all these parts out they did add some extra suspensful parts, like the Burrow's burning. Despite the parts they left out I still think the Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, was still the best movie so far and let's hope that Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, will have all the scenes, that it has in the book. That's probably why they're making two movies.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Mannu967 said:
They probably wont even do the wedding scene , since they always leave out soo much , and they don't have the house anymore , but dunno .

But yeahh , I was really angry they didn't show the funeral , and the whole movie was just terrible . The 영화 went untill GoF were good , but the last 2 ones sucked . :(
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
They're doing wedding scene because I saw the cast list and they casted a Bill Weasley and I read that they weren't going to hide Harry as a Weasley cousin. Plus if 당신 see some pics from the filming they show Ron and Harry in like dress robes and Hermione in a red dress
Beatlesxoxo posted over a year ago
DiNozzosShorty said:
yeah the fifth and the six 영화 were horrible! compared to the book i really was upset :')
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
bessmarvin1 said:
I was angry.But they say that the 7th movie starts with the funeral
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
NataliaLidia said:
im not. dey wuld haf messd up the funerl nd it wuldnt haf ben sad at all!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
KnougeChick said:
I really think that they should have done the funeral. I think Dumbldore was my 가장 좋아하는 character. I've read the book twice. The first time I read about Dumbldore dying, a few tears. I cried so much 더 많이 the 초 time I read it. I really think that they weren't giving him respect....
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
13seuferer said:
Ya I agree its stupid, but don't forget that didn't have Ginny and Harry be boyfriend and girlfriend. So u can't expect much.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
MarauderForever said:
I saw this and immediately thought "What IS this? I don't remember this!" Then I went on 유튜브 and remembered that scene... )= I wish it kept true with the 책 more. They shouldn't have burnt down the Burrow, but in a world of magic, they at least have a plausible reason for the return of the Burrow.

I think the only good part, was the fact that it features 통스 and Remus. Because 통스 doesn't show up nearly as much in the 영화 which disappoints me. Like the fact that it's 통스 that saved Harry on the train, not Luna.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
next question »