이 질문에 답하기

해리 포터 질문

Do 당신 completely HATE David Yates now?! (read inside)

I don't know how many of 당신 have heard, but there's apparently going to be a "very sexy 사랑 scene" between Harry Potter and Hermione Granger in Deathly Hallows, for which Daniel Radcliffe will be entirely naked and maybe even Emma Watson too. I'm not sure of the details, but I'm taking it to mean the worst. Well, congratulations all 당신 Harry/Hermione shippers.

Now, if 당신 excuse me, I'm going to look up David Yates' 이메일 address and send him loads of hate mail. Anyone care to 가입하기 me?
*
it'll be the horcrux scene...i heard harry would be naked but not for that scene, for the one where hes at kings 십자가, 크로스 with dumbledore
lauracullen66 posted over a year ago
*
no way......
lovedrchase posted over a year ago
*
I already hates Yates, lol.
Mrs-Grint posted over a year ago
 weaslyismyking posted over a year ago
next question »

해리 포터  최고의 답변

shieldmaiden said:
Well if 당신 look back on the scene in Deathly Hallows on pgs. 376-377, the whole thing that caused Ron to destroy the locket was his anger at Riddle-Hermione 키싱 Riddle-Harry, whom he feared Hermione may have a crush on since she opted to stay with Harry instead of leave with Ron earlier in the novel. The following passage shows what I mean:

" 'Who wouldn't prefer him, what woman would take you, 당신 are nothing, nothing, nothing to him,' crooned Riddle-Hermione, and she stretched like a snake and entwined herself around Riddle-Harry, wrapping him in a close embrace. Their lips met. ...Ron looked toward him [Harry], and Harry thought he saw a trace of scarlet in his eyes." (Rowling 337).

So 당신 see, the scene is a necessity, and it does need to involve the 키싱 and it does need to make it look like Riddle-Harry and Riddle-Hermione are seriously involved so that enough anger over the situation boils over in Ron causing him to destroy the locket. Furthermore, in much 팬 art, including the 더 많이 well known one below 의해 =mary-dreams, the Riddle forms of Harry and Hermione are depicted as being nude, so it makes logical sense that Yates would have the two actors perform the scene at least semi-nude (I can't see too much nudity b/c I'm sure they want to keep it PG-13). It also seems logical to assume in the novel that the Riddle forms were nude, even though it was not mentioned.
select as best answer
 Well if 당신 look back on the scene in Deathly Hallows on pgs. 376-377, the whole thing that caused Ron to destroy the locket was his anger at Riddle-Hermione 키싱 Riddle-Harry, whom he feared Hermione may have a crush on since she opted to stay with Harry instead of leave with Ron earlier in the novel. The following passage shows what I mean: " 'Who wouldn't prefer him, what woman would take you, 당신 are nothing, nothing, nothing to him,' crooned Riddle-Hermione, and she stretched like a snake and entwined herself around Riddle-Harry, wrapping him in a close embrace. Their lips met. ...Ron looked toward him [Harry], and Harry thought he saw a trace of scarlet in his eyes." (Rowling 337). So 당신 see, the scene is a necessity, and it does need to involve the 키싱 and it does need to make it look like Riddle-Harry and Riddle-Hermione are seriously involved so that enough anger over the situation boils over in Ron causing him to destroy the locket. Furthermore, in much 팬 art, including the 더 많이 well known one below 의해 =mary-dreams, the Riddle forms of Harry and Hermione are depicted as being nude, so it makes logical sense that Yates would have the two actors perform the scene at least semi-nude (I can't see too much nudity b/c I'm sure they want to keep it PG-13). It also seems logical to assume in the novel that the Riddle forms were nude, even though it was not mentioned.
posted over a year ago 
*
Yeah, I didn't know the full details and thought it was just a 랜덤 scene, which made me really pissed. Thanks for the explanation. I really need to reread DH again.
weaslyismyking posted over a year ago
*
me too, stuff keeps popping up that I forgot happened, such as Ron's splinching after the double Apparition from the Ministry to Grimmauld to the forest. Oops. Glad to be of service though! =)
shieldmaiden posted over a year ago
*
I like the pic, but seriously...
AprilCandy42 posted over a year ago
next question »

답변

brittlegirl94 said:
Please relax, weaslyismyking, I looked into this and an 기사 on mugglenet.com clears it up completely. Here is a excerpt;

"It's a fascinating scene in which Harry and Ron (Rupert Grint) [are] trying to kill a Horcrux (a magical creature). He tries to defend [himself] and creates an image of Voldemort's soul, [and there are a] series of 이미지 between which are Harry and Hermione (Emma Watson) 키싱 and embracing. And we will create something that feels very sexy and very intriguing to bring about reaction of Rupert (who Hermione is in love)."

See? It's just in Ron's imagination because the power of the locket is trying to anger him. That's all. link is a link to the full mugglenet story. :)
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
yeah, LOL thank 당신 for the link. Though I still think they should be wearing clothes for that scene :/
weaslyismyking posted over a year ago
*
Fascinating that it describes a horcrux as "a magical creature".
Cinders posted over a year ago
*
though they're not exposing it
AprilCandy42 posted over a year ago
SwarlsBarkley said:
Lol, such unnecessary anger.

It's for the Horcrux thing when Ron sees that image right before he smashes it, it's not 'real'.

BTW, 당신 might want to add a spoiler warning to this.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
ohh. ok. Still, I don't think the nakedness is necessary. And I'm still sending David Yates hate mail cuz I hated him before that anyway. And thanks for the spoiler warning tip.
weaslyismyking posted over a year ago
*
though I really can't do anything about it now
weaslyismyking posted over a year ago
*
i think it's stypid to do naked scnene...even it is image that Ron see's it! They should cut it off
Rosel_15 posted over a year ago
han-han said:
I agree as this will cause some underage people to not be able to see the movie. But it will show how much Ron like Hermione (kinda cute). Its also kinda gross to have Daniel Radcliffe naked too though (ewwwww).
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
Yeah, plus it would be awkward to see it with parents. And I agree with the Danile Radcliffe naked thing LOL
weaslyismyking posted over a year ago
*
OH NO. I might not be able to see it?!?! I smash the down the fricking cinema!!
Mrs-Grint posted over a year ago
*
I dont wanna see Daniel's naked butt O_O
Rosel_15 posted over a year ago
dustfinger said:
LOL that's going to be interesting. ultimate fear of Ron besides spiders. lol
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Mongoose09 said:
DANIEL RADCLIFFE NAKED IS FREAKIN' DISGUSTING. FORGIVE ME WHILE I GO AND PUKE AND BATHE IN SOME ACID.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
Why are 당신 all 연기 like he's never done it before? Am I the only one that remembers Equus? Jebus, it's not like it's Barbara Walters naked, it's Daniel Fricken Radcliff. Chill out people.
Cinders posted over a year ago
*
Yes, calm down, love. 당신 can shield the precious 꽃 of your innocence 의해 covering your eyes! 당신 don't have to see him nakey. <-- That was originally a typo, but I prefer it...
Mrs-Grint posted over a year ago
*
I'd 사랑 to see Cherrybomb.
ABDCFan- posted over a year ago
Mrs-Grint said:
What?? I thought that was just a rumour! I won't care if it's the 'breaking-of-the-horcrux-part' because that actually happens. But if it's just randomly thrown in there... I'm gonna be a tad pissed.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
rose_storm17 said:
Yep!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
kitkat211 said:
Your an idiot!! The story has already been told.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
What story are 당신 talking about?
weaslyismyking posted over a year ago
*
Book 7!!! DUH!!! We all know what happens!!!
kitkat211 posted over a year ago
*
Yeah.... I still don't understand what you're saying
weaslyismyking posted over a year ago
chagrin91 said:
who just hates it when they cut scenes from the book in the movie|???
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
LOL i do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! nd they mostly skip the good scenes
Mugglestar96 posted over a year ago
kellyclarkson12 said:
Daniel is hot!!!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
grindelwald said:
No!As the film will be watched 의해 mainly teenagers I am sure Dan and Emma won't appear totally naked!I guess such a scene between Dan and Emma would be great.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
xXBubbleGumXx said:
They won't be fully naked because it's also aimed at young children
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
Yeah they'd lose a lot of viewing if they showed them fully naked.....
zelo posted over a year ago
*
There'd be alot of publicity though.
Mrs-Grint posted over a year ago
*
They'll remember there are 4-104 (OMG) yr old people out there, watching the frickin' whole scene. I'm SOOO covering my eyes. I suspect my 프렌즈 won't, they LLOOVVEE *disgustedly* it...
AprilCandy42 posted over a year ago
tomfeltonfan44 said:
Errrrrrrrrr............no thanks. Maybe some other day......
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
shrutz said:
i dont care whether he is naked in deathly hallows. they are being paid for it. but on the other hand to see harry and hermione naked would be the worst part in to see. i m sorry t say this but this is what i think :( :( :(
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
next question »