이 질문에 답하기

해리 포터 질문

Did anyone else think that Muriel Weasley's tiara was Rowena Raveclaw's diadem?

Because i did
 emmarupertluver posted over a year ago
next question »

해리 포터 답변

hp_maniac said:
yeah, I had that idea when I learnt about Aunt Muriel's tiara for the first time.. What a coincidence!!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
LadyNottingham said:
Impossible. Ravenclaw's diadem is said to have been 로스트 for ages. Muriel's tiara was kept in her home.
Besides, while Ravenclaw's diadem is described to have the House 모토 engraved on it, it is not said to be goblin-made. While Muriel's tiara is.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
HecateA said:
Either when they were at Hogwarts for it, 또는 when Ollivander goes to Muriel's I started thinking 'hey, that tiara's been passed down in a pureblood family that wasn't always bloodtraitor material for a long time, right?' Guess not, but oh well, it was still a cool hidding place. And how Harry walked right past it once before? Tss... Just goes to show how little details aren't always so little.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
simpleplan said:
No because why would Voldemort give it to blood traitors
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
jenn17 said:
no because the tiara was in the room of requirement
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Tigerlily888 said:
YES-for a wild moment i did!!! :)
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
next question »