해리 포터 대 트와일라잇 Club
가입하기
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
I made a list of combined and possible plot holes about Harry Potter. Some of them I came up with myself, and some of them I got from different places online. If 당신 can give explanation answering the 질문 ,do it please.
I purposely put in a few really really picky 질문 because there are a lot of 기사 about Twilight like this, so I want to see how Harry Potter 팬 respond to the ridiculously picks questions. I'm not going to tell 당신 which ones they are, but they should be easy to pick out.





1.    Why do the founders of Hogwarts have surnames? Family names weren’t used in Western Civilization until the 19th century, but Hogwarts was founded in the 990s, 10th century. But each of the four founders, Godric Gryffindor, Helga Hufflepuff, Rowena Ravenclaw, and Salazar Slytherin, all had normal first and last names. Society didn’t even use nicknames 또는 occupational names back then. They only used first names.


2.    In The Goblet of Fire, Dudley has a Playstation, but the first 플레이스테이션 wasn’t released until December of 1994, and only in Japan. Dudly was playing with his 플레이스테이션 earlier in the year.


3.    In the game of quidditch, if the Snitch flies at the speed of light, how can Harry catch one in his mouth without it shooting through the back of his throat 또는 at least breaking his teeth?


4.    Why was there no mention of witch burning? They studies wizard history, but they didn’t mention it at all. The Salem Witch Trials happened in America, but there were also a lot of famous European witch hunts in the 15-18th century (That’s where Carlisle Cullen’s back story comes from). It was all about witchcraft and magic, why wasn’t it significant enough to teach? Hogwarts is supposed to be a school of WITCHCRAFT and wizardry.


5.    JK Rowling said once "magic is a dominant and resilient gene" in a magazine interview. If magic was dominant, there wouldn’t be any muggle-borns 또는 squibs. If magic is a dominant gene, 당신 can’t inherit it from someone who doesn’t have it. If they had the gene at all, they parent would have the ability to do magic. It would make 더 많이 sense if she said magic was a recessive gene. If the gene was recessive, then two parents, each with a recessive gene, would be able to have a magical baby without being magical themselves. Also, squibs wouldn’t be possible. If two parents with dominant magic genes have a baby, then the baby would have a dominant magic gene. Especially in pure blood families because they would have two dominant magic genes so they would have no choice but to pass down a dominant gene.


6.    In Order of the Phoenix, Harry takes his O.W.L test in June. He was taking his astronomy exam outside and he was asked to chart the constellation, Orion, but Orion isn’t visible on any latitude in June.


7.    He also had to locate Venus, but Venus only goes as far as 47 degrees from the sun, but he was taking the test at midnight. Venus would have been on the opposite side of the planet.


8.    On the cover of link there’s an illustration of a link, but it should be a link


9.    In the first book, a snake winks at Harry. Snakes don’t have eyelids. It wasn’t a magic snake, it was a normal snake. Did the eyelid magically appear when Harry casted a spell on it?


10.    The basilisk was known for chewing and tearing its prey apart, but real snakes 제비, 삼키기 their 음식 whole. Did magic give the basilisk 더 많이 teeth and a different kind of jaw that allows for chewing?


11.    Hedwig was a Snowy Owl. Snowy Owls aren’t nocturnal like most other owl breeds. They sleep at night and fly during the day. They’re also very quiet, in comparison to other owls, but Hedwig would shriek in her cage all night long when normally, she would hardly make any noise at all and she would be asleep at night.


12.    Harry tried to feed Hedwig vegetables once, but owls don’t eat vegetables so she wouldn’t eat them. Why didn’t Harry just use the vegetables as bait to catch mice 또는 bugs to feed her? He’s seen them all over his house, so he knows they’re there.


13.    In Quidditch Through the Ages, it says that the first ever World Cup was in 1473, with a match being held every four years. Yet the World Cup in Goblet of Fire, set in 1994, is number 422. There can't be 422 world cups in 521 years with a four-year gap in between


14.    When 당신 look really closely at all the dates and birthdays in the books, 당신 can conclude that Andromeda 통스 was 20 years old, 또는 possibly younger, when Nymphadora was born. But that would mean that Andromeda and Bellatrix are the same age, which would make them Twins. Was there any explanation of this?


15.    It was said that Hogwart’s students were close to evenly distributed between the four houses, and during Harry’s sorting ceremory, there were only 5 Gryffindor boys and 5 Slytherin boys. That means there is about 40 people in Harry’s 년 all together. That means there are an estimated 280 students in all of Hogwarts. During one of the Quidditch matches, it says that there are about 200 Slytherin students alone. Why was Harry’s 년 so low on students? Why weren’t there 더 많이 kids born the same 년 as Harry? And there are 14 subjects taught at Hogwarts, and only one teacher for each subject, and Harry said each class has about 20 students in it. The math doesn’t match up at all. If there are 200 Slytherins, that means there are about 800 students in Hogwarts?


16.    The hogwart’s schedule is really weird too. Each class is an 시간 long and they start at 9:00 am. They have two classes, a break (which seems like it’s about 30 분 to an 시간 long when 당신 think about all the things they do during their break) then another class. Then they have lunch. So that means they have lunch at 12:30 또는 1:00. And then they have another break right after lunch, then two 더 많이 시간 long classes. Does this mean that the school 일 ends at 5:00 pm? That’s kind of late for a school day. And what time to they eat dinner? They seem to have a lot of free time before they have to go eat dinner.


17.    There are also population problems. It says there are about 3,000 wizards in Great Britain. If there really are 800 students in Hogwarts, why are there so many children? Why is 25% of the wizard population between the ages 11-18? Also, with a population that small, how do they manage to support so many Quidditch teams? It’s implied that each team has a very large fanbase, but there aren’t even enough wizards for the teams to have many fans. And how does the economy work with such a small population? The government is larger than needed for a small population. This would only work if the Ministry never gets paid.
added by goodtimes
added by cassie-1-2-3
Source: MAD Magazzine
added by cassie-1-2-3
Source: Entertainment Weekly
added by xharrypotterx
added by Gred_and_Forge
Source: Tumblr
added by SnapeLovesLily
added by lilcherrywine
added by KateKicksAss
Source: Polyvore
added by KateKicksAss
Source: Polyvore
added by KateKicksAss
Source: Polyvore
added by KateKicksAss
added by Gred_and_Forge
Source: Tumblr
added by youknowit101
Source: blogspot
added by Brysis
***NOTE: I did not write this but found it online! No credit to me***

From link

The Twilight vs. Harry Potter 토론 : Team Potter and Team Twilight take on 질문 #1

December 24, 12:44 AM
의해 Michelle Kerns, Book Examiner

If 당신 haven't met the members of the Twilight versus Harry Potter 토론 Team, cast your eye on their qualifications here.
Now, on to the debate! If you've got your own opinions (and what self-respecting Twi-hard 또는 Potter head doesn't?), feel free to leave a 코멘트 at the bottom of the page. However, let's remember we are civilized witches, wizards, vampires, and werewolves...
continue reading...
Okay guys, I know everyone's got their own opinion and not everyone has the RIGHT opinion, but as a Twilight fan, can one of 당신 Potter 팬 explain what 당신 guys see in Harry Potter? Honestly, I haven't read all the books, but I've seen all the 영화 and they just don't make any sense. And another thing, the plot is bland and there's no real depth to it, like in Twilight. Harry Potter, also has no 사랑 in it, which makes for a boring story. Anyways, I just wanted to know what 당신 crazies see in those 책 and stuff...

Okay...
See ya :D

Mariella
xxx
1. its just all thrown together and the 영화 leave out way to much.
2. it has no meaning just a girl falls in 사랑 then is a vampire the end.
3. is just plain stupid.simple as that
4. theres nothing to figure out. its to predictable.
5. it dosent have enough back story which goes back to # 1
6.and stephine myer wants to keep all the good players while j.k. isnt afraid to for the sake of the book
7.why doesnt she mentention why bellas parent got seperated which geos back to #4
8. it has no plot
9. the problem is the same all the way throughout the sires as h.p. faces many problems.
10.its down right boring hmm lets read the same boring thing over and over! yea! NOT!
TEN REASONS TWILIGHT IS HORRIBLE!!!!
posted by i-am-mariella
I’ve seen articles, like bri-marie’s, comparing Bella, Twilight’s “heroine” to the girls and female role 모델 of the Harry Potter 책 like Hermione and Ginny. I agree with them whole-heartedly and I am happy to follow in the footsteps of strong women from Harry Potter – like Ginny, who is fierce and pretty bad-ass and just 사무용 겉옷, 전반적인 a strong female, and Hermione, who is studious and smart and witty and the boys often rely on her skills and “genius.” Because let’s face it – and Ron says it himself – where would they be without Hermione?
So I wanted to make my own because...
continue reading...
"This 키스 between Hermione and Ron is highly anticipated, it's been building up for eight films now. And Harry Potter is not Twilight, 당신 know; we're not selling sex." - Emma Watson

If 당신 think Emma Watson is stupid for quoting this, 당신 are outta your mind. 당신 think Twilight's not selling sex? Irony. Irony how some twi-hards reason out "BECAUSE EDWARD CULLEN IS SO SEXY!!!" if asked why Twilight is better than Harry Potter.

For me, Twilight is just 인기 'cause it has sex appeal. Wait for several years, no one will be talking about Twilight anymore.. Harry Potter won't be talked about that much but it will never be forgotten.In my case, I know Harry Potter will be a future classic.

Twilight 팬 go ahead and attack me, whenever you're ready.
Obviously, this spot is about debating Harry Potter and Twilight, and I realised I've never written an article, so I decided to put down all my reasons for Harry Potter being better than Twilight.

Firstly, the 'love' in Twilight is not love. It is over powered lust. To my memory, Edwrad and Bella never have a conversation about from who loves the other more. Edward likes Bella because she smells good, Bella likes Edward because he's 'handsome' (which can't even be proven, he's a book character, we never see him).

The 사랑 in Harry Potter is shown as an amazing, all powerful thing that can sace...
continue reading...