이 질문에 답하기

해리 포터 대 트와일라잇 질문

Why did they make Breaking Dawn into 2 영화 ? What's the point ?

If the Deathly Hallows made into 2 movies, I understand. Since there are a lot of important information 또는 scenes that can't be cut.

But, breaking dawn? are 당신 kidding ?
there's no important information 또는 anything in that book. Nearly half of the book is Edward and Bella's honeymoon.

So, help me, give a good reason why Breaking Dawn should be made to Part 1 and Part 2? Because I really can't understand.
THANK 당신 =)
 ReibyKathBlack posted over a year ago
next question »

해리 포터 대 트와일라잇  최고의 답변

cassie-1-2-3 said:
While it's not exactly action packed, it is long. A lot does happen. There are two seperate plot lines in the book. The wedding/honeymoon/birth, then there's the raising of Renesmee/Volturi threat/training with all the vampires/confronting the Volturi. (I don't know how it will be divided up. That's only a guess)
If all that was squeezed into a typical 2-hour movie, it would only allow roughly 15 분 on each topic. It deserves 더 많이 than that, no matter how much certain people dislike it.

There are plenty of long 영화 without nonstop action.

select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
Yes, a lot. In addition to what I said, there's all that happened with Jacob. Him running away, leaving the pack, forming his own separate pack. My math was off at first, sorry, but now, it would be at 10 분 to spend on each point.
cassie-1-2-3 posted over a year ago
*
righty there
youknowit101 posted over a year ago
*
Here
cassie-1-2-3 posted over a year ago
next question »

답변

GemonkDruid said:
They wanted to copy Harry Potter, of course.

What? It is a good reason. Lots of people want to copy HP. Percy Jackson did (yeah, HP fans, I admit it; but I still 사랑 PJO more!). The Magician's Daughter did. I did... sort of. Well, I subconsciously copied Harry's look.

While it's completely understandable to want to be like one of the greatest book/movie phenomenons ever, there's this little thing called plagerism. That's why Bella doesn't have red hair and Edward doesn't have glasses and a scar. So they did the 다음 best thing: copy the franchise style.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
yeah, when I heard about this BD thing i'm like WTF ?! oh well ....
ReibyKathBlack posted over a year ago
*
Wenever said it was, but if your beiigest competitor is splitting a movie into two, you're AL LOT 더 많이 likely realise just how much profitable it would be. Especially when they saw how well it went down with the 팬 :) x
Italktosnakes posted over a year ago
*
*We never *biggest *A
Italktosnakes posted over a year ago
zanhar1 said:
I alaways thought it was to make 더 많이 money.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
lakota_spirit said:
Two films= Twice the money.......... its all about the money!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Italktosnakes said:
I think that there's quite a lot of stuff going on, that may have needed it to be a bit longer than normal two-hour movies- even if a lot of stuff is absolute crap (as is some people's opinion).
But I also think that the fact that DH is 스플릿, 분할 made them realise just how good splitting it is. Obviously there gonna get at least twice as much money from this, and that's just ticket sales. Proper 팬 will get posters from both parts and other merch. Money wise- it's an obvious 옮기기 really. :D x
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
IzzyOzera said:
Because Stephanie Meyer wrote a book full of crap (at least in my opinion)and then the people making the movie though they should keep all the same crap in the movie then realised it was too long and thought um what should we do, then heard DH was going to be two 영화 and went "I know we'll make two movies"
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
bri-marie said:
They actually kind of did have a lot of information in Breaking Dawn. There was the wedding and honey moon and Bella finding out she was pregnant (it is still a romance so they aren't going to cut those parts out/down), there's the thing with Jacobs wolf-pack, the explanation (however half-assed it was) about Nessie, Irina finding out about her and running to the Volturi, there's the whole explanation about the Immortal Children, Alice and Jasper running off, the gathering (and practicing) of the other clans, and the "showdown" at the end. It's too much stuff to put into one two-hour long movie.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Sasume said:
There is no answer. There is no understanding. Twilight is crap (in my opinion) and they decided it would make it better to copy HP's style...I doubt I'm wasting money to watch two halves of crap...
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Ms_Mea said:
I have a simple answer for you:
MONEY!

Think about it; Twilight is HUGE these days, so a lot of fangirls/guys are going to want to see BD and will pay a lot of money to see it...
Then HP announced that they're splitting DH into two parts.
Now, I'm sure 당신 all know that HP is also a big thing, therefore they are also making a lot of money from their 영화 as well...
So then some "genius" on the Twilight set thought, "Hey! Let's make two 영화 and get LOADS of money just like HP!" (the HP bit may 또는 may not have been included the their thought process...depends on the intelligence and how anti-plagerism this genius is)
Therefore BD: Pt. 1&2 is born
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
RandomRebekah said:
Yeah, what is the point?
I bought breaking dawn and i dont know how anyone could read the whole book 또는 even like it!
its c***.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
sehrish-cullen said:
i think it the last part of the series...so definitely it contains a lot of stuff about other vampire too...like kate and her mother...there are lot of characters and each character has its liltle story in it...plus the honey moon was just fine not too long
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
ecpjll said:
It's called drawing it out to make 더 많이 money. duh. They did it with Harry Potter too. Now people have to pay to see 2 더 많이 영화 as opposed to 1.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
next question »