1. She is too young. Most of the princess are teenage age 또는 older.
2. Her movie was a critical and financial failure. It is a mostly forgotten movie most people don't know about, as well as being abhored 의해 critics and audiences as well. Why promote a princess of a failed movie? People will just watch that movie to check her out and find out that it's terrible.
posted over a year ago
Sleeping Beauty was a faliure but it grew on people thats why they waited a long time before makeing another fairty-tale The Little Mermaid and they used Aurora
sleeping beauty was not a failure. It received mixed reviews from critics. It was also somewhat of a financial success 의해 normal standards, but compared to how expensive it was, it really wasnt. black cauldron was both a critical and financial failure.
I suppose because she is too young and old at the same time :p
It's true though, she's considered to be very young (thirteen, fifteen at most), and even though her sarcasm and magic was kick ass, her movie was from such a long time 이전 (this isn't a valid argument though, as Snow White, Sleeping Beauty, and 신데렐라 were all very old too)
당신 all keep saying she is too young but isn't Alice classed as an Un-official 디즈니 princess meaning She isn't a princess in her story but she is classed as one. Also, dealing with alice, it would unvalidate any claim that she wasn't based on a fairy tale but a novel because it's the same for Alice. And how can she be too old? Snow White is the oldest but she is a princess? So how can alice who is not a princess be classed as one when an actuall princess is not?
