토론 Club
가입하기
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
I've been disheartened to hear rhetoric and see actions in the media lately that show me just how appallingly sexist our so-called "modern" and progressive society still is.

Yes, I'm calling sexism on this one, and no, that's not a word I wave around carelessly.

I'm calling sexism because a number of women's issues have come up in the public 포럼 lately, and no one seems to care A) what women think about that 또는 B) perspectives on issues that aren't fifty years old. I recently 게시됨 link which details exactly how offensive these conversations are.

Women On The Front Lines

Let's look at the most recent issue that's come up lately: women in the military, on the front lines. Rick Santorum insists that having women on the front lines in combat zones will be detrimental to the army on the whole, because male soldiers will see the women and want to "protect," them, because that's their instinct.

I find fault with this for two reasons. Firstly - Well, I should hope so that soldiers will want to protect other soldiers. That's in the military code - leave no man (or woman) behind. A unit functions as a family. You'll want to watch your fellow soldiers' backs regardless of their sex.

Secondly, 당신 want to protect things and people that 당신 see as weaker than 당신 are, 또는 incapable of protecting themselves. For example, we want to protect children and valuable assets like jewelry 또는 fine art. Women are neither of these things. They are adults who have served in the army in many other capacities for years. Why not the front lines? The only protection women in the military need is against sexual assault.

This leads me to my 다음 point. While Santorum is worried about protecting women, 여우 News contributor Liz Trotta is worried about men being unable to control their urge to rape them.

Trotta, who in 2008 infamously joked about "knocking off" 또는 assassinating Barack Obama, believes that the 64% increase in sexual assaults in the military since 2006 is the fault of having men and women work so closely together. "What did they expect?" she asks, as if mixing the sexes will inevitably lead to rape in any circumstance (which is probably why we segregate everything else in society 의해 gender, right?). Jon Stewart link about how we have set up and are paying for so much "bureaucracy" - 당신 know, rape counselors, victims' advocates, etc - because women are being "raped too much."

In the words of Stewart - "Are 당신 not horrortained?"

This is as offensive to men as it is to women. To suggest that men cannot control urges to either protect 또는 rape women - and these are the only feelings they can have towards women - is ludicrous. Honestly, I'm sure that men 읽기 this don't check a box "rape" 또는 "protect" in their head every time they meet a new woman in their lives, right?

But the assumption that men can't control these urges - whether to protect 또는 to rape - isn't condemned. It's not their fault, of course. They can't help it. It's those damned women who are causing the problem 의해 simply existing. They are the distraction. They are the ones that make men want to either rape 또는 protect them. It's their fault.

Contraception

Women on the front lines is one thing. Let's talk about an issue that hits closer to 집 for 더 많이 people. Oral contraception, namely, "The Pill," a medication women take to control their cycles and ovulations in order to avoid pregnancy. Because when they talk about "funding contraception," that's what they're talking about. Condoms cost literally cents, and many hospitals already offer them free any way. But it's the pill that costs money, and that's what they're upset about. Believe me, I should know. I take it.

Now first of all, let me just state this up front: If 당신 believe that any form of contraception is wrong, be it condoms, birth control pills, diaphragms, 또는 what have you, then that's fine. Continue to practice your natural, abstinence only family planning. Yay for you! But if you're against the idea of insurance funding birth control pills, I have an eye-opening statistic for you.

According to Doctors For America, 58% of women use contraception at least in part for other reasons other than family planning. Among these reasons are treating endometriosis, hormonal imbalances, debilitating menstrual cramps, even acne. They need the birth control pill to keep them healthy.

I am one of the people who does not take the Pill for contraceptive reasons. I couldn't care less if it prevents pregnancy. I use it to treat a medical condition called Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. Like the name implies, without the medication, I can develop harmful cysts on my ovaries, and it increases me chances of developing endometrial cancer. That's right, cancer. For all I know, if I stop taking the pill I could not only have painful cysts, but I could get cancer. Yeah, I'd rather not.

The problem is, even the generic brand of birth control costs $80 (without insurance). Luckily, I have an insurance that recognizes birth control as a necessary medication, and my copay for the generic is only $10. As a part time private school employee, I can afford to spend $10 a 월 on my medication. I would not be able to afford $80 a month. That adds up my friends.

But people don't get that. Many people don't understand that there are legitimate medical reasons for women to use birth control that have little 또는 nothing to do with contraception. I have a lesbian friend on birth control, too, also for medical reasons. She's a lesbian. She can't get knocked up 의해 another girl. Why the hell else would she be doing birth control?

Some people - like billionaire Santorum supporter Foster Friess - believe that only "loose" women use birth control. He even suggested that how women used to do birth control "back in his days" was to use a Bayer aspirin - link.

Now for those of 당신 who need a 분 to understand what he's implying, I'll let 당신 have that. For the rest of you, he's saying that women who keep their knees together don't need birth control. Because it's the women's job to keep it in their pants in the first place, and if they don't work out those thigh muscles, they have no one to blame but themselves when a rapist pries them open.

So protest contraception if 당신 want. Say it's not in God's plans. Don't use it - no one is forcing 당신 to, after all. But don't assume that all women who do use it are dirty whores, who sleep around and don't care if they murder their unborn children.

I use birth control. 레즈비언 use birth control. 당신 probably have 프렌즈 who use birth control. We aren't unborn-baby-killers, we're human beings just like you. And we deserve our own health and the right to make our own choices in regard to contraceptives. Whether we keep our knees together 또는 not.
added by Kegel
Source: http://action.credomobile.com
This 기사 is basically about something i keep seeing around the 토론 spot 또는 on other 토론 포럼 and it is, in my opinion the rudest and most insulting thing 당신 can do in debate

no I am not talking about swearing

no I am not talking about denying the existence of someone's believes

no I am not even talking about flashing your opponent to distract them

I am talking about the one line comment

some of 당신 may be slightly confused as to why I get so annoyed 의해 this so let me clear things up

I have no issue with people bringing up a new point that they have just summed up in a short space, I...
continue reading...
added by Sappp
Source: Deeasillustration.com
added by KarbonKopy
Source: http://liberallogic101.com/
added by Cinders
Source: http://www.stickershoppe.com
added by amazondebs
Source: bushflash.com
added by kateliness2
Source: MarcelloSendos
added by rusty746454
Source: gobalwarming
added by Dragonclaws
Source: http://americancensorship.org/
added by jameswilson
I was going to call them the "Ten Commandments" but felt someone might be offended 의해 that (either a religious person thinking I'm blasphemous 또는 a secularist thinking I'm showing a bias towards religion. Lose, lose, 당신 see). Also, I couldn't come up with ten rules.

So instead, observe the Golden Rules of the 토론 Spot.

1) RESPECT your fellow debaters. They believe what they do for a reason just like 당신 do. As opposed to simply trying to explain why they're wrong, explain your point of view and LISTEN to theirs. If 당신 find 당신 simply just cannot understand their views, 또는 that they will...
continue reading...
Live Above the Influence - Weed - Commercial
video
live
above
the
influence
weed
commercial
2009
added by zanhar1
added by zanhar1
added by kateliness2
Source: MarcellosSendos
added by amazondebs
Source: destonio
posted by LadyL68
So, many of 당신 are aware of the rumor floating arround that the world will end tonight at 6:00 PM. I just have a few things to say about these "End of The World" theories, becasue they're really getting on my nervs.

I just want to say that first off, for those of 당신 who do belive the world will end tonight, 또는 in 2012, 또는 whatever, I mean no disrespect to you. I also don't mean any disrespect to people's religious beliefs that say the things I'm about to adress.



So, yesterday afternoon I heard that there is yet another prediction for the world ending. First it was the 년 2000, then the...
continue reading...
posted by harold
This is a 토론 seed, and was last edited on 8 April 2008.

As a 팬 of debate, I've often railed at the absence of actual 토론 in the 토론 spot. Therefore I present a 질문 for debate:

Are mechanical pencils 또는 wooden pencils better?

Cinders has done a marvelous job of initiating a number of formal limited debates, so I propose a different type of 토론 format for this one. For this, the Great Pencil Debate, the following 토론 attributes will apply:

Non-judged

Open-ended

Participatory

Moderated

What these mean:

Non-judged is a 토론 format wherein there are no judges...
continue reading...
In our world today, global warming is a growing issue. Global warming (according to the Merriam-Webster online dictionary) is an increase in the earth's atmospheric and oceanic temperatures widely predicted to occur due to an increase in the greenhouse effect resulting especially from pollution. This means we must take action. This is a method commonly known as "going green." We do this 의해 riding bikes, using public transportation, reycleing, and much more. This is common for big cities like New York City, New York 또는 Chicago, Illionois- but what about the smaller towns?



I live in Joplin,...
continue reading...