토론
이 질문에 답하기
토론 질문
What do 당신 think about these theories and the related stuff?
I have 게시됨 this on the 랜덤 club as well.
So, I have been doing some thinking recently and kind of wondered how scientists are confident about the big bang creating the universe, yet the 1st law of thermodynamics exists (this law states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed; only transferred 또는 transformed). As it stands, this contradicts the idea of the big bang, since there was nothing to make the explosion happen, as far as how it's been explained.
However, there are theories can work with this.
1. The Multiverse Theory: This is the idea that we are just one of an infinite number of other universes, 또는 large amount of other universes. This, I assume, would work with energy from another universe somehow connecting to ours (like, it created the big bang and formed a new universe from it). This has potential, since it works with the 1st Law of Thermodynamics and is consistent with the creation of the universe, since another universe would potentially have a different set of physical laws than ours, even if it did create our universe.
2. The 1st Law of Thermodynamics is wrong, 또는 only partially correct: So, I actually don't like this one very much, since I think this one is actually quite observable, even on Earth. For example, when 동물 die, they become part of the Earth and that energy is given back to Mother Nature. When energy is used up, on the planet, then it is often recycled, but some is 로스트 as heat, 또는 disorder. I think we could say that is pretty consistent, if 당신 look at global warming, natural 또는 otherwise and climate change due to the global warming.
3. Pre-Existing Universe theory: So, this would imply that the Universe was already in existence when the big bang occurred and, therefore, the big bang did not violate the 1st Law, as it just exploded and re-distributed matter that was already in existence. I'm sure that such an explosion was probably 더 많이 attributed to matter forming new planets and stars, as well as oth
So, I have been doing some thinking recently and kind of wondered how scientists are confident about the big bang creating the universe, yet the 1st law of thermodynamics exists (this law states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed; only transferred 또는 transformed). As it stands, this contradicts the idea of the big bang, since there was nothing to make the explosion happen, as far as how it's been explained.
However, there are theories can work with this.
1. The Multiverse Theory: This is the idea that we are just one of an infinite number of other universes, 또는 large amount of other universes. This, I assume, would work with energy from another universe somehow connecting to ours (like, it created the big bang and formed a new universe from it). This has potential, since it works with the 1st Law of Thermodynamics and is consistent with the creation of the universe, since another universe would potentially have a different set of physical laws than ours, even if it did create our universe.
2. The 1st Law of Thermodynamics is wrong, 또는 only partially correct: So, I actually don't like this one very much, since I think this one is actually quite observable, even on Earth. For example, when 동물 die, they become part of the Earth and that energy is given back to Mother Nature. When energy is used up, on the planet, then it is often recycled, but some is 로스트 as heat, 또는 disorder. I think we could say that is pretty consistent, if 당신 look at global warming, natural 또는 otherwise and climate change due to the global warming.
3. Pre-Existing Universe theory: So, this would imply that the Universe was already in existence when the big bang occurred and, therefore, the big bang did not violate the 1st Law, as it just exploded and re-distributed matter that was already in existence. I'm sure that such an explosion was probably 더 많이 attributed to matter forming new planets and stars, as well as oth
|
next question » | ||
|
|
|||
