I have a few 더 많이 질문 on/about female violence

Before anything else; would 당신 mind clarifying exactly what 당신 mean 의해 female violence? Do 당신 mean physical, verbal, sexual, 또는 all three?

5. Is female violence EXCUSEABLE?

Excusable for the most part no. Acceptable, yes. Before anyone gets mad, let me explain. I think it's acceptable as far as male violence is via slapstick comedy in fiction. But other than that, not really. It's excusable only if the female is being violent first and the man needed to defend himself.

6. 의해 any chance is female violence seen as "cute" as well as in a positive light?

Not at all. Similarly to the X-Men thing feminist get up in arms at anything even remotely abusive. Take Twilight for example (though I think this one is actually very reasonable) so many people were angered 의해 Edward's stalking of Bella and his controlling demeanor. This one was actually rational. However in tumblr's Once fandom there are people who get butthurt about Hook being too controlling for Emma when it's not the case. He's even been called a rapist. Even the implication of violence against women is seen negatively. And there's nothing I've seen feminist complain about 더 많이 than abusive relationships being glorified. Which is completely okay 의해 me so long as they don't twist the facts.

7. Have 당신 YOURSELF ever been a victim of female violence 의해 any chance?

I, myself, no. Thankfully. I like to think that I'd never allow it to occur.

8. Female violence have ALWAYS existed, have ALWAYS been there ever since the beginning of humankind/humanity as well as throughout the human race, am I correct?

I would say 당신 are correct. But male violence has also been prevalent and present from the very beginning an throughout all of the eras as well--if anything male violence was 더 많이 prominent in the past. Violence in general has just been around since the dawn of man. And sexual violence against women in older eras was actually considered acceptable. Just like physical violence against men.