So I was originally going to 게시하기 this 기사 in the 책 to Read spot, but then found this place, and I think it fits in here much better :) Anywho, this is an opinion 기사 I originally wrote for my school newspaper. Yes, it's a bit of a rant, but I don't mean to be offensive, so please don't take it that way. Enjoy :)
There’s no way 당신 haven’t heard of it. From the first publishing of that first book to the most recent perfume-bottle scandal, Twilight has permeated the very core of pop culture, not to mention high school conversation. No matter whether you’ve read the books, seen the movie, 또는 were just forced to listen to millions of girls babble about its “just amazing!”-ness, you’ve been exposed to that teen phenomenon: Twilight.
But is it really that great? I say not. And no, it’s not because I “just don’t get it,” as so many people have told me. I do get it – everyone wants to be that perfect girl who finds that perfect guy in that perfect whirlwind of a romance. But are the characters of Twilight really all that perfect? And what is it, exactly, that makes me hate the 책 so very much? Is it the awful 글쓰기 style? The horrid characters? The subliminal messaging? It’s all that, and more.
Little Miss Popularity
Let’s start off with Bella. She’s introduced as an average girl – average looks, average grades, average life. There’s nothing special about her. She’s just the girl 다음 door. At least, that’s what you’re supposed to believe. Except that as the novel goes on, it becomes 더 많이 and 더 많이 apparent that Bella is actually perfect (and not in a good sense of the word) in every single way.
“That’s not true,” 당신 say. “Bella’s not perfect at all! She’s just a normal girl!” Really? Then name just one character flaw. 당신 can’t, can you? Oh, and clumsiness? Yeah, not a character flaw. Without flaws, there’s just seeming perfection, right? Poor Jane Austen’s been rolling in her grave since the moment Meyer first decided to base her ridiculously perfect character on Elizabeth Bennet.
No good character is flawless; Bella, however, is just that. She claims to be generous and kind, always thinking of others before herself. She’s supposedly hardworking, caring, uncomplaining. For no apparent reason, everybody adores her. She makes 프렌즈 instantly, through no effort of her own – other people just walk up to her and instantly become her best friend. Every guy within a 5-mile radius is completely besotted with her, despite her (constantly) claimed ordinariness. She seems to be the It Girl of Forks, Washington.
But really, she makes a pretty crappy friend. She doesn’t actually seem to like anybody in her life (except for Edward, of course). She can barely tolerate her high school friends, she thinks her parents are pathetic, and she treats Jacob like dirt. Superiority complex, much? She barely speaks to anybody, except to use them – especially her supposed best friend, Jacob. From flirting with him to get the werewolf vs. vampire story from him in the first book and exploiting his naiveté to “hear” Edward yell at her in the 초 one (and what was that about, anyways? A short bout of schizophrenia?), all the way to splitting up his 늑대 pack and then (justifiably) freaking out over his disturbing wolf-crush on her newborn daughter in Breaking Dawn, Bella basically walks all over the poor kid. Funny how the only time she ever displays any gumption at all, it’s only to use and manipulate everyone around her. That’s real swell, Bella. And don’t even get me started on that pathetic “But I 사랑 JACOB, too!” attempt at a plot twist in the third book. If you’re going to suddenly fall in 사랑 with a 초 character, at least have the courtesy not to go on about how much 당신 absolutely, always-and-forever, over-the-moon luurve
the first guy for over 1000 pages. Make up your mind, for heaven’s sakes.
But besides her (definitely not purposeful on Meyer’s part) evilness, isn’t Bella just bland and boring? She does nothing exciting for the first 500 pages of any of the books, and then, in sudden, 20-page action sequences right at the end, she faces an ominous death threat from which she is, of course, rescued 의해 one of her male minions. But in those first 500 pages, she does absolutely nothing but gripe to the reader about how much her life totally sucks. Each and every little thought that ever flitted through her mind-numbingly boring brain is written down in meticulous detail, no matter how insignificant 또는 irrelevant that thought was. Not only that, but she finds some sadistic pleasure in repeating herself over and over and over, changing up the adjective order every once in a while. I mean, I get it. She’s in love. But really, spare me the details about how “unworthy” she thinks she is of her little boy toy. Because to me, she makes herself sound like she should have LOW SELF ESTEEM – HANDLE WITH CAUTION stamped across her forehead in bright red caps.
Come on. He even looks abusive.
Bella’s co-star in the series, Edward, is a hundred-plus-year-old vampire stuck in a seventeen-year-old’s body. The supposed epitome of male beauty, he proves himself to be an abusive jerk. “Not Edward!” 당신 say. Well, let’s look at the evidence. Below are a few points from an link
dealing with how to spot a potential abuser (the 인용구 from the 기사 are bolded):
1) Admits to hitting women in the past.
Hitting? Try ripping them to shreds and setting them on fire. While Bella’s watching. If that doesn’t sound any warning bells, then I don’t know what would.
2) Shows up unannounced at your job, home, 또는 places 당신 visit.
Oh, 당신 mean like her bedroom? In the middle of the night? To watch her sleep? Creep.
3) May offer to take 당신 to any of these places on a daily basis so that 당신 may grow dependent on him.
Kind of like how he insists on driving her to school, back home, to work, to Jacob’s – that is, before he flatly refuses to let her leave the house, which takes us to numbers 4, 5 and 6:
4) When 당신 want to visit with a friend, go out to the 영화 또는 some other past time, he oftentimes vehemently objects 또는 he uses tactics to make 당신 feel guilty so that 당신 will stay home.
Need I remind 당신 how many times he didn’t let Bella go wherever she wanted, including her best friend’s house, because it was “dangerous”?
5) When he is angry with 당신 he keeps 당신 in a room with no access to a phone. He may lock 당신 in the room.
Like the numerous times that he claimed he was “protecting” her, 의해 not letting her visit her friends, call her family, etc. Which is especially obvious in the fourth book, when he takes her to a desert island and doesn’t let her have any contact with any of her 프렌즈 또는 family, all to “protect” them.
6) He threatens to commit suicide when 당신 try to break up with him.
I really don’t think that I need to explain this one. Stephanie Meyer did an excellent job drilling it into our heads.
7) He doesn't like who he is and makes regular references about himself as being "stupid," "ugly," "dumb," and asks you, "Why do 당신 want to be with me?"
Again, self-explanatory. Just substitute the word “monster,” “killer,” and “murderer” for “stupid,” “ugly,” and “dumb.”
8) He expects 당신 to call him wherever 당신 go and will become angry if 당신 don't.
Again, this is only to protect her, of course. Because poor, defenseless Bella can’t even be trusted to spend some quality time with her 프렌즈 without somehow almost getting herself killed.
And that’s only a few of the points mentioned in the article. Clearly, Edward is one messed up guy. The fact that he displays so many “potential abuser” warning signs should scare Bella silly. But since it’s Edward, it’s all okay. After all, he only does it because he loves her.
Even if 당신 can somehow manage to get past Bella’s pathetic excuse for a personality and Edward’s dictatorial behaviour (and kudos to 당신 if 당신 can), then you’re left to deal with the writing. I honestly have no idea how 또는 why Brigham Young University, Stephanie Meyer’s alma mater, gave her a B.A. in English. I’m going to blame it on large class sizes 또는 something, and pretend Meyer managed to somehow sneak past the professors on her way to the commencement stage. Still, no editor worth his/her salt should have ever considered publishing the novel, at least not without major revisions. Because there’s no two ways about it – Meyer simply cannot write. Even people who adore the Twilight series agree with me here. Pretty much any author on the face of this planet could do a better job with the story. People claim that Twilight is the best romance since Romeo and Juliet, since Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy, since Harry met Sally. But would someone care to point out where, exactly, the romance is?
The story begins with poor little Bella, unwanted 의해 her own mother – who’d rather spend time with her shiny-new hubby (and really, who can blame her?) – moving in with her dad in the hole that is Forks, Washington. Since she’s underage, she must continue with her education, the poor thing, and so it’s off to high school she goes. There, she’s instantly mega-popular, adored 의해 all – except the hottest boy in school, who seems to hate her for no reason she can fathom. Oh, no! Whatever will she do? Well, nothing, really, except complain. At least until super-hot-boy comes back to school a few days later. Very, very few things happen and are described in intimate detail, and then Bella decides that since super-hot-boy doesn’t like her, he must be either blind 또는 one of the undead. So she Googles vampires, and lo and behold – super-hot-but-strangely-uninterested-boy fits tons of the descriptions provided. Bella confronts him, and he confesses to being a vampire. And now that the “uninterested” part is conveniently taken care of – boom, Bella and super-hot-boy are both madly in love.
Where is the romance? There’s no 사랑 story there. Not even a love-at-first-sight story. Just an easy method for Stephanie Meyer to spread her extremist right-wing propaganda under the façade of a 판타지 사랑 story. Now, I know that most of 당신 won’t agree with me here, but just hear me out.
Yes, I realize this woman's from the '50s. I just couldn't find a picture of a 1900's housewife in the kitchen
To begin with, Stephanie Meyer seems determined to set the feminist movement back a good 50 to 100 years. She makes Bella into a submissive, I’ll-do-whatever-my-male-counterpart-tells-me-to-do, early-20th-century housewife-like creature. She has no will of her own, no mind to do anything even remotely interesting. Everything she does, it seems, is done to benefit some male character in the story. Be it Edward, Jacob, 또는 her father, she always seems to be serving and obeying some guy. Let’s look at her average day, shall we? She gets up, and dresses nicely to look good for her boyfriend. She goes to school and gets decent grades so as not to worry her father. She comes home, where she proceeds to cook and clean for her dad. Sometimes she visits her friend Jacob, so that he doesn’t feel left out; sometimes she goes out with her friends, so that her dad doesn’t think she’s some psycho freak with no friends. Then she goes to her room, and talks (or not, if 당신 know what I mean) with her boyfriend. Then she goes to sleep.
Not at any point in her 일 does she ever do anything for herself. Her life revolves around the men in her life, pleasing them, being subservient to them. If she, 의해 some complete fluke, manages to get herself in trouble, she’s pathetically useless. Forget about trying to do anything remotely useful to save herself – she always counts on some man to save her while she stands in a corner and screams prettily. Bella’s a pitiable, pathetic damsel-in-distress, completely useless to have around in tough situations. What happened to the independent woman? Girl power, and all that? Meyer seems determined to destroy her readers’ notions of a woman’s ability to do anything for herself. What kind of a model is Bella for third-wave feminists everywhere?
Bella’s greatest ambition in life seems to be to please Edward. And isn’t that reminiscent of the early 1900s? Think about it – 의해 the age of nineteen, Bella’s a married teenage mother with no prospect of a future. She’s completely dependent on her husband’s money; she plans on living her life for him and their child. She doesn’t want an education 또는 a job. What Meyer seems to be saying is, screw feminism and everything women have accomplished – what really matters is having a man to serve.
Edward’s extreme abstinence-until-marriage ideals are paraded through the 책 until the couple does get married – and that’s when the no-birth-control issue comes in. Of course, since they didn’t use any birth control, Bella gets pregnant – and she becomes determined to give up her life for no reason whatsoever. She succeeds in dying pointlessly during childbirth – really, the only time she’s ever been successful at anything. And why does she die in such a brutal way? Because she idiotically refuses to allow Carlisle, an experienced doctor, to deliver her baby through a C-section. Why would she do that? The baby was pretty much fully developed; the procedure would have been 안전한, 안전 for both her and the baby. But instead, she waits until the pregnancy goes horrible wrong, and then proceeds to kick the bucket in the most painful way Meyer could imagine. The birth is gruesome: the baby breaks her spine and rips her insides to shreds before it’s delivered, then bites her the first chance it gets. Once she’s pretty much taking her last breath, Edward finally decides to turn her into a vampire. What a shining example for girls everywhere to emulate.
Now, what I’m about to say may seem completely contradictory to the rest of this article. But I truly think that the storyline, if given to an author who had any actual talent, might make an amazing novel. Hey, even Stephen King agrees with me: the background story’s good. Just change everything else, and you’ve got yourself a hit.