이 질문에 답하기

Critical Analysis of Twilight 질문

Sparkling Skin: Predator point of view?

OK, so not many people like the idea of a vampire sparkling. Sparkles = glitter = girly = fail. Not exactly sexy and manly and thrilling. But... Stephenie Meyer made her 뱀파이어 sparkle in order to attract prey. Their prey is humans, and what do humans tend to be attracted to? Beauty. Sparkles = oooh pretty = come closer. Possibly that's how Stephenie was thinking when she decided on their sparkly skin.
What do 당신 think? Are the sparkles understandable with this in mind? 또는 do 당신 think 'nah, the 뱀파이어 are meant to be beautiful WITHOUT sparkling, so why glitter'?
*
Oh, forgot to say, sorry if this has already been asked!
HerMelody posted over a year ago
*
I think its another delusional unfactual thing to lure in young girls. 저기요 I 사랑 glitter,but not on Vampires.
Flounder13 posted over a year ago
*
LOL yes xD
HerMelody posted over a year ago
 HerMelody posted over a year ago
next question »

Critical Analysis of Twilight 답변

Asvini said:
Interesting idea. I can understand someone being ok with the sparkles on this basis.

It still doesn't work for me personally though. The Twilight 뱀파이어 are so overly powered. Just super strength alone would be enough to catch human prey, on 상단, 맨 위로 of that they have the speed, beauty and an assortment of additional powers such as mind reading. The addition of sparkles is so pointless. 당신 could take away a ton of their powers and hunting humans would be just as simple. There is something so unnecessary about the vast amount of powers they have.

Also, there's the fact that I don't think there's a time in history it would have worked. These days our reaction to sparkles has mostly been mockery so I see very few people being attracted to it (not to mention the amount of mundane explanations one could come up with for it these days, meaning it wouldn't even have the allure of being mysterious) and in the past people were 더 많이 fearful of mythological creatures, and would probably be 더 많이 likely to fear something visibly inhuman, so it seems like simply being attractive would be 더 많이 helpful than the addition of sparkles in any era.
Finally, we have to assume their powers are to help them hunt. If not, simply being attractive would be enough and they'd need no other powers. As predators they need the ability to sneak up on things (not just humans, other predators that may be a threat such as the werewolves) and sparkles makes that impossible in 일 time. They would be unable to sneak up on 또는 hide from any enemy, because of their beacon-like skin, a deadly hindrance for a predator. That's why real predators evolve the exact opposite of sparkles, camouflage, because it's a survival necessity. So to me sparkles not only add nothing helpful, they actually hold 뱀파이어 back.

That's just me though, not putting down your theory, 또는 anyone who is ok with/a 팬 of the sparkles :)
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
WELL SAID, Asvini! Very impressive.
LadyLilith posted over a year ago
*
Great answer! I just wondered what people thought, as I was sitting and thinking about the whole 'sparkle to attract prey' thing, thought I'd ask what others think of it!
HerMelody posted over a year ago
LadyLilith said:
I see what 당신 mean. But Asvini pretty much said everything I was going to say. I may also add that the 뱀파이어 in Twilight hide the fact that they sparkle from humans. So really, what was the point of them sparkling?
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
Another good point -_-' hmmm there are big flaws to these sparkles.
HerMelody posted over a year ago
*
There are big flaws to the Twilight series in general. I apologize if you're a fan, but that's how I see it. :/
LadyLilith posted over a year ago
*
I agree about the flaws in Twilight. Still, it's a light read that I can get into without taking it seriously 또는 thinking too much about it lol. Sometimes it's nice to just sit down and read some nonsense, and being a Jacob and 늑대 팬 helps.
HerMelody posted over a year ago
Phoebe_Gabriel said:
Hmmm let me think for a minute...
Ok so 뱀파이어 that sparkle... I don't think that this helps a predator very much. 당신 see 뱀파이어 are attractive in their own way, they have extreme beauty, intriguing personallity, dark nature and not to mention superspeed and superstrength and only the first 3 are enough to draw a young girl in order to feed from her. There isn't that much dark in a vampire that sparkles-sorry if I offended anyone- Meyer made her 뱀파이어 not being able to resist human blood and when they taste it they can't stop drinking until they have drained the victim dry. But 뱀파이어 tend to satisfy their victims before killing them and not doing that including glittering kinda freaks out. And also if they want to hunt during the 일 glittering prevents them because they don't want to be exposed... but if it its like that then why do they glitter? Sparkling is 더 많이 of a burden rather than a weapon.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
Sorry I guess this is a little complicating...
Phoebe_Gabriel posted over a year ago
*
I know exactly what 당신 mean Phoebe_Gabriel!
HerMelody posted over a year ago
MadamOcta13 said:
I always thought-no, wait, it always has been that 뱀파이어 attracted their prey through hypnosis. NO GLITTER NEEDED!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Cola020 said:
The Salvatores are real vampires!
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
tdafan121 said:
The only thing that would lure in is an idiot. No offence to anyone 또는 anything.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
ork100 said:
I would like to think this is 더 많이 complex than that. Could it be that the author was thinking about how 뱀파이어 are immortal? Perhaps something in their cells has crystallized and that is what preserves them 또는 whatever is in their tissues that stops decay is reflective. Sunlight causes damage to molecules, perhaps it is built in very effective suntan lotion. 뱀파이어 are meant to have demons inside them and Lucifer comes from the latin for light, perhaps it is their demonic side sparkling. Lots of fun possibilities that go beyond being pretty and glittery. I did think the scene in the film was rubbish, seriously sparkly required.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
I pretty sure Meyer would have hinted towards something of that kind in the books, but good argument.
Aqua_Rose posted over a year ago
Aqua_Rose said:
Personally, I don't think people would be attracted to the sparkles, simply because although sparkles are pretty, and enchanting, and attractive, on a living creature, particularly on a creature that is supposed to look at least vaguely human, would be rather distressing and confusing, and people are probably 더 많이 than likely to either attack it 또는 run away, both of which are in vain against a vampire. So, after that ridiculously long sentence (sorry, it's a habit of mine), I agree that the sparkling is completely unnecessary- particularly as 뱀파이어 are notoriously hunters of the NIGHT, and so their sparkles in the daylight would not necessarily be seen 의해 their prey.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
Book-Freak said:
I don't think they sparkle to attract prey - I think it's an effect of the transformation. In the Illustrated Guide, it says this:

'In direct sunlight, the disparity between humans and 뱀파이어 becomes 더 많이 obvious. The cellular membrane of the vampire is not as soft 또는 permeable as in a human cell; it has crystalline properties that cause the surface of vampire skin to react prismatically, giving the vampire a glitter-like shimmer in sunlight.'

So the effect of the venom in the transformation upon the human cells is the reason for the sparkling.

Also, I think they make the sparkling 더 많이 noticeable in the movies. After 읽기 the meadow scene, I visualized the sparkling as 더 많이 of a soft glimmer.
select as best answer
posted over a year ago 
*
Haha, I put far too much time into thinking about that so nice to know I was on the right track. I'm not a twilight 팬 so haven't read the 책 but I was a vampire 팬 in my teens, Anne 쌀 though, so when I saw that bit in the film it sent the grey cells ticking. It's good that the author has come up with new ideas, boring when something made up gets to be dogma.
ork100 posted over a year ago
next question »